Optomissy sounds all steamed up today.
Socialism on chess.com
Sort:
Normal people? What is that exactly?
alexlehrersh wrote:
And now since i wrote something non-left again chess.com punishes me again and rigs my matchmaker so i losse all matches again
the hundred time they do it. More evidence that chess.com censores nornal people the lick left people ta
What makes you say that?
Ziryab wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
Facetious and derogatory attacks on whistle-blowers, even if the intention is that others should consider them "joking and not malicious" are in fact malicious and support a generally toxic atmosphere on an internet site, as prevails here because moderators fail to stop you persecuting and stalking others. Chess.com is probably acting against the law and should change its attitude to online stalking, which should no longer be tolerated. The best way forward is the provision of a blocking function.
I’ve blocked thousands, even you briefly.
But you have blocked no-one. There's no blocking feature here. Facebook has a blocking feature, for instance. All there is here is muting, which prevents direct messages. It doesn't stop stalking.
Optimissed wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
Facetious and derogatory attacks on whistle-blowers, even if the intention is that others should consider them "joking and not malicious" are in fact malicious and support a generally toxic atmosphere on an internet site, as prevails here because moderators fail to stop you persecuting and stalking others. Chess.com is probably acting against the law and should change its attitude to online stalking, which should no longer be tolerated. The best way forward is the provision of a blocking function.
I’ve blocked thousands, even you briefly.
But you have blocked no-one. There's no blocking feature here. Facebook has a blocking feature, for instance. All there is here is muting, which prevents direct messages. It doesn't stop stalking.
Suggestion: Leave this thread. Make one of your own. Block everyone you feel the need to.
What a snowflake. You lose games because your opponent was better. C.C doesn't punish people by making them lose games.
How would that even be possible?
You're still joining games about instantly, right. Not saying that to mock you, but to help you ease your mind on something that's probably nothing
alexlehrersh wrote:
Festerthetester hat geschrieben:
What a snowflake. You lose games because your opponent was better. C.C doesn't punish people by making them lose games.
your partof their game so of cuouse you lie for them
Yes I work for C.C to take points from you. You are a seriously sad little fellow.
Aug 19, 2023
0
#3711
Optimissed wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Optimissed wrote:
Facetious and derogatory attacks on whistle-blowers, even if the intention is that others should consider them "joking and not malicious" are in fact malicious and support a generally toxic atmosphere on an internet site, as prevails here because moderators fail to stop you persecuting and stalking others. Chess.com is probably acting against the law and should change its attitude to online stalking, which should no longer be tolerated. The best way forward is the provision of a blocking function.
I’ve blocked thousands, even you briefly.
But you have blocked no-one. There's no blocking feature here. Facebook has a blocking feature, for instance. All there is here is muting, which prevents direct messages. It doesn't stop stalking.
It prevents more than direct messages, but it does not wholly hide you the way FB blocking works.
alexlehrersh wrote:
Festerthetester hat geschrieben:
alexlehrersh wrote:
Festerthetester hat geschrieben:
What a snowflake. You lose games because your opponent was better. C.C doesn't punish people by making them lose games.
your partof their game so of cuouse you lie for them
Yes I work for C.C to take points from you. You are a seriously sad little fellow.
I never said you worked for them but maybe i shot dog makes noises
I are simply the ideology group chess.com is part of or at least pampers to
Idiology group? You mean not 'normal' like you?
alexlehrersh wrote:
DiogenesDue hat geschrieben:
alexlehrersh wrote:
PeaceandLove2U hat geschrieben:
alexlehrersh wrote:
PeaceandLove2U hat geschrieben:
Optimissed wrote:
I don't have any respect for this site any more, because they allow people like you two to infest the place.
Seriously, what a poor take?
i dont trust this site because the banned my first account because someone quoted me falsely.
The culprit is still here btw
Misunderstandings, happened to a few others here.
You are back after all
The person who missqouted me did defently not missunderstand, He did it out of malice because i called out is fraudelence
Moderators do not mute or ban people based on quotes in reports. They look up the posts themselves. There sure seem to be plenty of people that have conjured up persecution complexes around here to avoid scrutinizing their own behavior.
Definetly not. I did not insult others and i was insulted and used sarcasm to defent myself. I used similar words than Sotelo days before he was murdered by socialists. The person only quoted half of a sentences from me and i called him out of it i got banned.
So yes the leftist mod banned me because another left extremist member lied about me. There isno denying that and if chess.com wouldnt have deleted the evidence than i wold have prove enough for a trial.
But since you dont have morals and are you a bottom leftextremist you probably find the injustice against nonleft normalpeople good like all left scum I have seen.
You can't have a trial over your "rights" to speak online on a privately owned website. You don't have any. So you "called him out"...what exactly did that consist of? Admit it to yourself. If you got banned for it, not muted, then it was far more than just "calling him out".
Optimissed wrote:
This site is ignoring the norm that a blocking feature should be provided so that all who need to protect themselves from a stalker may be blocked. This site doesn't have a blocking feature. Since you pursue people around the site and send them derogatory and insulting messages as a matter of course, rationalising that they "need to be corrected", you are actually a stalker. What you are doing is illegal and it's questionable that Chess.com is obeying the law in allowing you to attack and generally persecute people. The same goes for the other trolls but they take their lead from you.
It's gone on long enough and it needs to stop now.
I do not send messages, you would think you would know that from your abortive attempts to ingratiate yourself with me. I can post the last couple I kept again, if you like. I post on the forums, and I do not /follow anyone or send harassing messages to anyone that doesn't want messages from me...ergo, there's not a single thing illegal about anything I am doing here. That's pure fantasy.
Your stalker moniker can only apply to posters...well, like you, who have admitted to looking up people's homes, etc. because you didn't like them. I can post that again, too, if you like. You're a nasty piece of work, no doubt...but luckily, not too effective.
Optimissed wrote:
The nurse Letby trial in the UK has highlighted the fact that the persecution of whistle-blowers can no longer be tolerated. In cases where moderators don't act and the anti-social situation continues, it becomes natural to take whatever action is appropriate, to stop people stalking and persecuting others online.
Lol. You are not a whistle-blower...not in any sense of the term. More pure fantasy. You're an irate old man who isn't getting his way on his chosen sanctuary, and can't handle having his behavior exposed for what it is. Big difference.
alexlehrersh wrote:
And now since i wrote something non-left again chess.com punishes me again and rigs my matchmaker so i losse all matches again
the hundred time they do it. More evidence that chess.com censores nornal people the lick left people ta
So, confirmation bias comprises your entire outlook on life, then?
Here's a thought...maybe if the few posters here that are incapable of seeing themselves look at each other instead, then realize "that's how I seem to everyone, too", you could make some headway in becoming better people.
Alex...
Do you think Optimissed is a downtrodden champion of truth and justice, a whistleblower being illegally persecuted and having his civil rights suppressed for doing what is right? Or is that a little far-fetched in your mind?
Optimissed...
Do you think chess.com hires left leaning customer support people to make Alex lose all his games when he gets uppity? Does that makes logical sense to you? Or is that the textbook definition of confirmation bias?
Wait now that's unfair. He could blow a whistle if he wanted too. Or even a tuba.
Festerthetester wrote:
Wait now that's unfair. He could blow a whistle if he wanted too. Or even a tuba.
Doubtful...he's got long Covid, remember.
Facetious and derogatory attacks on whistle-blowers, even if the intention is that others should consider them "joking and not malicious" are in fact malicious and support a generally toxic atmosphere on an internet site, as prevails here because moderators fail to stop you persecuting and stalking others. Chess.com is probably acting against the law and should change its attitude to online stalking, which should no longer be tolerated. The best way forward is the provision of a blocking function.
I’ve blocked thousands, even you briefly.