Ziryab wrote:
Instead of socialism, can we talk about democracy?
Nice photo and cool shirt concept...but I'm guessing you'll need a far less colorful image to appeal to the posters crying oppression...
Socialism on chess.com
Sort:
Aug 19, 2023
0
#3723
Reimagining this thread as a fantasy conflict...
Dio and his Clan of Twenty....
Opimissed, Heroic opposition leader.
That's the way I picture him but with more hair.
alexlehrersh wrote:
So either chess.com is lazy in oversight or its their policy (hidden but in plain sight)
So sad you are. C.C is picking on you and you're the normal one. Shameful.
Here's a clue for you. When you claimed to be normal you lost the argument.
Aug 19, 2023
0
#3726
DiogenesDue wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Instead of socialism, can we talk about democracy?
Nice photo and cool shirt concept...but I'm guessing you'll need a far less colorful image to appeal to the posters crying oppression...
This shirt will trigger all the bigots at once.
alexlehrersh wrote:
PeaceandLove2U hat geschrieben:
How would that even be possible?
Sinply
store data from the players( win rates in ceratin lines, the accuracy of the day, move time and what they play then if you want match someone (eg me) against someone i have a higher chances losing
Online games with a competiv mode do it already
Ah, that probably means someone is manually flagging your account. If someone is why not keep your account flagged Indefinitely? Instead of just a set amount of time?
The England goalie just saved the penalty. I ask you ... it wasn't a penalty ... clearly accidental handball, the England player was trying to avoid the ball & bad referee because she had VAR to look at. The Spanish are hurling themselves onto the floor at any opportunity and the referee has lost control. 
DiogenesDue wrote:
alexlehrersh wrote:
And now since i wrote something non-left again chess.com punishes me again and rigs my matchmaker so i losse all matches again
the hundred time they do it. More evidence that chess.com censores nornal people the lick left people ta
So, confirmation bias comprises your entire outlook on life, then?
Here's a thought...maybe if the few posters here that are incapable of seeing themselves look at each other instead, then realize "that's how I seem to everyone, too", you could make some headway in becoming better people.
Alex...
Do you think Optimissed is a downtrodden champion of truth and justice, a whistleblower being illegally persecuted and having his civil rights suppressed for doing what is right? Or is that a little far-fetched in your mind?
Optimissed...
Do you think chess.com hires left leaning customer support people to make Alex lose all his games when he gets uppity? Does that makes logical sense to you? Or is that the textbook definition of confirmation bias?
I can't see them hiring left leaning support at all, given Erik's background. It wouldn't fit and I'm not interested in the results of games which are basically just blitz practice games, more than likely.
At one time I would have replied that you know very well that you're a serial offender who deliberately started this latest round of acrimony, and that you have done your usual trick of perpetuating it and burying the origins. I can only hope that if this is looked at, the moderators have the patience to look at it and the concentration to help them understand that you and you alone are responsible for the acrimony here. Because there is a few weak people who follow the leader. Most people don't get involved because they do understand your character, which is to start trouble and protect yourself by resorting to any means that you can.
And I'm only interested in the truth of the matter.
And the Spanish player Parallelogram should have been sent off on 80 minutes, for dangerous play. More weak and poor refereeing.
Optimissed wrote:
I can't see them hiring left leaning support at all, given Erik's background. It wouldn't fit and I'm not interested in the results of games which are basically just blitz practice games, more than likely.
At one time I would have replied that you know very well that you're a serial offender who deliberately started this latest round of acrimony, and that you have done your usual trick of perpetuating it and burying the origins. I can only hope that if this is looked at, the moderators have the patience to look at it and the concentration to help them understand that you and you alone are responsible for the acrimony here. Because there is a few weak people who follow the leader. Most people don't get involved because they do understand your character, which is to start trouble and protect yourself by resorting to any means that you can.
And I'm only interested in the truth of the matter.
You have never been interested in truth, just in pretending to be the arbiter of it.
Optimissed wrote:
you alone are responsible for the acrimony here.
You are the last person justified in making this accusation. I don't detect anger and bitterness in anyone here but you.
" Get the torches. We must hunt them down. The battle is begun". 
Spain won
They were the better team on the day. I think there was a problem with the England team from the outset. Certainly the England manager didn't call it right and should have put Lauren James on at the beginning or after 20 minutes when it was clear England wasn't firing. Her call and her fault. I had feelings of foreboding in the first two minutes. England was acting as if they were scared of Spain.
5 mins game just played, fun checkmate with no way out for black.
In other news, the New England Patriots beat the Green Bay Packers last night 21-14. 
Aug 20, 2023
0
#3739
Ziryab wrote:
DiogenesDue wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
Instead of socialism, can we talk about democracy?
Nice photo and cool shirt concept...but I'm guessing you'll need a far less colorful image to appeal to the posters crying oppression...
This shirt will trigger all the bigots at once.
I took a closer look at that picture. Yes it has all the symbolism that will trigger Republican-Rage .
Aug 20, 2023
0
#3740
It appears that the far right think tank, Cato Institute, took a sharp turn to the left.
https://www.cato.org/blog/trumps-toast-folks
Or maybe, because they employ lawyers, facts still prevail in their world.
No,that goes straight down the Q-Annon Rabbit Hole of no return.