The Birth of Rock & Roll

This has some interesting reads.....https://case.edu/ech/articles/r/rock-n-roll
That actually was quite informative on the radio aspect. They warned Alan Freed on the evils of Rock & Roll but he wouldn't listen.... and it didn't end well.

Your overview accords well with most of the histories of the era that I have read.
Some books that I assigned in my Modern America History course that bear on the issue include (never all at once, although it would have been fun to make the course more than 20% about music): Hip: The History (2005) by John Leland; LeRoi Jones, The Blues People (1963); and William Howland Kenney, Recorded Music in American Life (1999). The last supports some of your pre-WWII generalizations, while the other two place youth culture front and center.
Add to these a full shelf of the leading works on American post-war culture and the spending habits of the Boomers when they were children.
I think you have a credible outline that highlights some of the ways that rock music developed.
I might also note that both The Who’s Tommy and Pink Floyd’s The Wall are stories of damaged children whose fathers fought in the war. This theme is not incidental to the music.
Thanks. I'm not an academic, so I try to be circumspect and remain open-minded. My impression is one of a perfect storm where so many things had to happen within a certain time span to create what would become one of the most energized musical genres. Do you think if McCarthyism hadn't been all but quelled by 1956 that it's tentacles would have also slithered into this nascent musical form before it could establish roots?

Alan Freed is credited with popularizing the term "Rock and Roll" as associated with the new music of the early 1950s. His view was "Rock ’n roll is really swing with a modern name. It began on the levees and plantations, took in folk songs, and features blues and rhythm". Rhythm and Blues is probably the greatest contributor to R&R. I dug up some old songs that may show some of the changes that brought about R&R. The rhythms of these three songs is essentially the same. The beat changes emphasis a little and the sound becomes what I would describe as more raw or rougher as time progressed.
1946 - Sister Rosetta Tharpe
1954 - Bill Haley and the Comets doing a remake of Big Joe Turner
Four years later in 1958 Chuck Berry was making history. The rhythm is still basically the same but the beats and chord structures have changed. Rock & Roll as we know it was emerging.
Sister Rosetta sure could jive....
Is that Chuck Berry ripping off "Surfin' USA"?

Here ya go: https://youtu.be/ZveMYqEqJyI
Ha!
They named the baby Rock and Roll....
There you go muddying the waters.

Who doesn't like Southern rock (other than Neil Young)?
He's not really around, anyhow...

TV had a role in "selling" rock&roll to try and get the loyalty of the young viewers, it's true, but in the early days I think it was more the performance of the artists that sold the genre than either tv or radio. Jerry Lee Lewis was known as "Killer" because of what he could do to a crowd (though it obtained a different meaning later on), Little Richard was another one that could work a crowd (even though he was "flamboyant", code for gay at the time). The cross-over with the blues helped to sell it to white crowds, as there were artists on both sides of the Atlantic that were being influenced by the great bluesmen of the 50s.
Live music is electrifying and really ferments a fan base. Luckily all these guys were real musicians (something we'll find to be less true in the 1960s) and they did a lot of traveling to smallish venues (by today's standards) such as county fairs and clubs, so when they did perform, the audience didn't need binoculars and the bands didn't need walls of amps...and it was more personal, I think.

Who doesn't like Southern rock (other than Neil Young)?
He's not really around, anyhow...
Actually I like Neil Young. He's still Neil but at 75 he's no longer Young.
for anyone who didn't get the allusion, Ronnie Van Zandt of Lynyrd Skynyrd wrote (in "Sweet Home Alabama"):
Well I heard old Neil put her down.
Well I hope Neil Young will remember
A southern man don't need him around anyhow

Freddie and the Dreamers had a couple songs in the awesome 1965 concert I posted in the OP of Come on guys!

Who doesn't like Southern rock (other than Neil Young)?
He's not really around, anyhow...
Actually I like Neil Young. He's still Neil but at 75 he's no longer Young.
for anyone who didn't get the allusion, Ronnie Van Zandt of Lynyrd Skynyrd wrote (in "Sweet Home Alabama"):
Well I heard old Neil put her down.
Well I hope Neil Young will remember
A southern man don't need him around anyhow
I like both Neil Young and Lynard Skynard...well, that's not quite accurate. I like a bunch of Neil's stuff including his days with Crosby, Stills, and Nash, and I like Freebird .

Who doesn't like Southern rock (other than Neil Young)?
He's not really around, anyhow...
Actually I like Neil Young. He's still Neil but at 75 he's no longer Young.
for anyone who didn't get the allusion, Ronnie Van Zandt of Lynyrd Skynyrd wrote (in "Sweet Home Alabama"):
Well I heard old Neil put her down.
Well I hope Neil Young will remember
A southern man don't need him around anyhow
I like both Neil Young and Lynard Skynard...well, that's not quite accurate. I like a bunch of Neil's stuff including his days with Crosby, Stills, and Nash, and I like Freebird .
They're oil and vinegar... you just have to like salad.

Your overview accords well with most of the histories of the era that I have read.
Some books that I assigned in my Modern America History course that bear on the issue include (never all at once, although it would have been fun to make the course more than 20% about music): Hip: The History (2005) by John Leland; LeRoi Jones, The Blues People (1963); and William Howland Kenney, Recorded Music in American Life (1999). The last supports some of your pre-WWII generalizations, while the other two place youth culture front and center.
Add to these a full shelf of the leading works on American post-war culture and the spending habits of the Boomers when they were children.
I think you have a credible outline that highlights some of the ways that rock music developed.
I might also note that both The Who’s Tommy and Pink Floyd’s The Wall are stories of damaged children whose fathers fought in the war. This theme is not incidental to the music.
Thanks. I'm not an academic, so I try to be circumspect and remain open-minded. My impression is one of a perfect storm where so many things had to happen within a certain time span to create what would become one of the most energized musical genres. Do you think if McCarthyism hadn't been all but quelled by 1956 that it's tentacles would have also slithered into this nascent musical form before it could establish roots?
Remember Tipper Gore and the other Senator’s wives who advocated warning labels? Frank Zappa’s response was classic.

Roots radicals and rockers (how skiffle changed the world) by Billy Bragg is an amazing book covering the birth of rock and roll. Well worth a read

BG, I have to disagree with your statement that "Luckily all these guys were real musicians (something we'll find to be less true in the 1960s)". The bands of the 60s played the crap gigs for crap pay too, just like the early ones, and after the Beatles and Dylan came on the scene, they wrote their own songs, too. The Beach Boys had a smash album with "Pet Sounds", and two years later they couldn't find a place to play because it was all about jamming out like Cream--if you couldn't play a song for twenty minutes, you didn't get booked. It went from 3 minute songs to 20 minute jams in a flash and left a lot of people behind. And, while not trying to promote anything here, don't discount the fact that the over-prescription of Benzedrine and amphetamines played a large part in that, a much larger role than LSD.
https://youtu.be/YzHtePuz13U