The moderators allow the left to discuss politics but not the right

Sort:
Avatar of saygrrmanytimes

Mmmmmm. @taseredbirdinstinct used a lot of logical fallacies to attack people.

Avatar of WTFrickenA
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
StumpyBlitzer wrote:

Behave yourself and stop causing issues, it's a new year let's follow forum terms of service. Thanks

Stop whining and making new trouble just because you lost. Don't give out any problems and you won't be having any issues. There were no problems here before you got here. Don't dictate yourself on my thread, I won't allow you to monopolise my thread, I will be the judge of that on here, quit the power trips and leave if you don't like it. Don't like it, deal with it by leaving.

🤣 just HOW TF is this thread still roll'n?

Avatar of WTFrickenA
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
StumpyBlitzer wrote:

Behave yourself and stop causing issues, it's a new year let's follow forum terms of service. Thanks

Stumpy, SHUT UP, you are an angry fool who is just having a power trip, GO AWAY.

Just LMAO he said power trip🤣

Avatar of WTFrickenA

Yo stumpy being beyond lenient with your absurdity dude

Avatar of WTFrickenA

Mass ⚽s

Avatar of USArmyParatrooper
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

Let's all stand up and petition against this tyrany, exercise our right to gather on the web. For freedom! The right wing have rights!

If a political conversation is up and not locked, regardless of the ideological spectrum, they get closed when seen. Of course, there are some topics that some people think are political, that really aren't really (even if there are some political parts), so those may remain open.

You are definitely lying, the moderators have turned a blind eye to a conversation that allows leftists to ramble on about the right in relation to fox news while banning conservatives, you should have closed that topic long ago which you haven't done.

Talking about FoxNews’ knowing and damaging lies is non-political. They’re just a news organization. And they’re Fair and Balanced, right?

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
saygrrmanytimes wrote:

Mmmmmm. @taseredbirdinstinct used a lot of logical fallacies to attack people.

Looks like you are a little numpty who has just revived a dead thread, although I'm sure to tear you apart after having been summoned. There's nothing fallacious about my argument. Learn the rules of logic before you start talking about fallacies. You don't even know what fallacies are, although I can definitely insist that in irregardlsss of what a fallacy is, a fallacy is not the same thing as my crushing blows to your poor arguments and unfounded belief systems.

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
USArmyParatrooper wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

Let's all stand up and petition against this tyrany, exercise our right to gather on the web. For freedom! The right wing have rights!

If a political conversation is up and not locked, regardless of the ideological spectrum, they get closed when seen. Of course, there are some topics that some people think are political, that really aren't really (even if there are some political parts), so those may remain open.

You are definitely lying, the moderators have turned a blind eye to a conversation that allows leftists to ramble on about the right in relation to fox news while banning conservatives, you should have closed that topic long ago which you haven't done.

Talking about FoxNews’ knowing and damaging lies is non-political. They’re just a news organization. And they’re Fair and Balanced, right?

Fox news is still news and news is classed as a political topic within the forums. Fox News isn't great, but CNN is far worse.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

news is classed as a political topic within the forums

Link please.

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

news is classed as a political topic within the forums

Link please.

That's your responsibility, not mine.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

news is classed as a political topic within the forums

Link please.

That's your responsibility, not mine.

It's your (false) claim. Now try to back it up (hint: you won't be able to find anything).

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

news is classed as a political topic within the forums

Link please.

That's your responsibility, not mine.

It's your (false) claim. Now try to back it up (hint: you won't be able to find anything).

You are now pleading that my claims are false out of denial. You are now claiming that there is no evidence and that I won't be able to find anything because there is too much dirt on you, since you will be proven wrong, you just don't like being refuted. Get on with it and put your money where your mouth is. The definition of politics on this site includes world events and issues that have strongly divided opinions, so don't get lippy with me.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

You are now pleading that my claims are false out of denial. You are now claiming that there is no evidence and that I won't be able to find anything because there is too much dirt on you, since you will be proven wrong, you just don't like being refuted. Get on with it and put your money where your mouth is. The definition of politics on this site includes world events and issues that have strongly divided opinions, so don't get lippy with me.

The only "lippy" person posting here is you. Back up your claim, or admit you knew it was sketchy when you made it by *not* posting a link, either way works.

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

You are now pleading that my claims are false out of denial. You are now claiming that there is no evidence and that I won't be able to find anything because there is too much dirt on you, since you will be proven wrong, you just don't like being refuted. Get on with it and put your money where your mouth is. The definition of politics on this site includes world events and issues that have strongly divided opinions, so don't get lippy with me.

The only "lippy" person posting here is you. Back up your claim, or admit you knew it was sketchy when you made it by *not* posting a link, either way...

Don't start getting uppity, it's not up to you to tell me whose being lippy here, that's my job. I already backed up my claims while you remain hopeless with your poor attempts to cover up how all of your lies have exposed you for the shifty individual that you are. You should already have known the rules and your ignorance is no reasonable excuse for you to expect others to explain the rules to you.

Avatar of DiogenesDue
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

Don't start getting uppity, it's not up to you to tell me whose being lippy here, that's my job. I already backed up my claims while you remain hopeless with your poor attempts to cover up how all of your lies have exposed you for the shifty individual that you are. You should already have known the rules and your ignorance is no reasonable excuse for you to expect others to explain the rules to you.

I'm not the one who doesn't know the rules. Your track record of getting muted displays this quite readily.

I will take your continued silence on the question of supporting your claim as surrender on your part...carry on.

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
DiogenesDue wrote:
taseredbirdinstinct wrote:

Don't start getting uppity, it's not up to you to tell me whose being lippy here, that's my job. I already backed up my claims while you remain hopeless with your poor attempts to cover up how all of your lies have exposed you for the shifty individual that you are. You should already have known the rules and your ignorance is no reasonable excuse for you to expect others to explain the rules to you.

I'm not the one who doesn't know the rules. Your track record of getting muted displays this quite readily.

I will take your continued silence on the question of supporting your claim as surrender on your part...carry on.

You have attempted to get me muted despite the fact that you are the ones who had broken the rules, despite your attempts at slander my track record is clean without a blemish unlike your evil corrupt friends within the corrupt system who are being exposed for breaking the rules so don't attempt to cover your tracks by muting me, as we have plenty of information exposing you and the facts do not look good for you.

Avatar of SoupSailor

Edited moderator stumpyblitzer 

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
SoupSailor72 wrote:
Taseredbird is back. How long will he last? I’m gonna go with 2 days. What do y’all think?

Your time of abuse, collusion and coordinated censorship is over. Good riddance. You have been reported. Give me 6 months and I'll probably last longer, it's plenty of time to wipe you corrupt freemasons off the site.

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

He must be off his meds again....you know, with the Coronation and all. meh

Avatar of taseredbirdinstinct
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

He must be off his meds again.

I don't take meds as I don't share the same sense of insanity as you, I've never taken medication in my entire life, only deranged liberals need placing on medication, I've been conservative all my life and I've never been forced to take meds. Funny you should say that, since words got out that you've been muted 4 times, tell me as to the reason behind why you got muted.