The moderators allow the left to discuss politics but not the right

Why don't you prove to us that Diogenes is right. Mention something on the "right" that will get this thread locked.

Woke people are foolish.

I see all the usual political clowns are back...

@taseredbirdinstinct, you don't have any actual proof behind your claim of me not knowing what a logical fallacy is. This leads me to believe YOU are the one who doesn't know what a logical fallacy is. Let me tell you the name of one of the fallacies you used while saying that I didn't know what fallacies are: 'ad hominem'. This means: 'to the man'. Which is when someone attacks the person making the argument instead of the argument.

👏

Your use of non-sequitars, presumptions and rantings without using any logical facts to counter my arguments demonstrates your lack of understanding as to what logic is, as well as to what constitutes as evidence, reason and proof, let alone your absolute lack of being able to comprehend what a fallacy is. Everybody knows what an ad hominem is, you are constantly getting personal while denying any evidence that shows how flawed your ability to reason is just based on how your arguments got shot down, you cannot take constructive criticism when your failed arguments and reasoning is showcased in front of you and you therefore can only lead to one conclusion about where your competence, rashness, desperation and lack of forethought stems from.

I am the one deserving of an applauds.

Eh I just don’t see any proof of your accusation. And as an avid clue player I have learned the importance of that

im for the right but i think ur wrong

do yall think we should pardon Edward Snowden

If you believe that the mods are biased against you, show some proof and evidence. Not every person is perfect, so some threads have been kept open for longer, however the mods are there to keep the forums civil and peaceful, giving them no motive for bias. All politics threads are shut down by the mods regardless of the stance. If you think that everybody on chess.com is "woke" and "leftist", then it is probably you're stance which is faulty. Even if you think you are correct, don't spread hate and insults if they are not firing back at you. No slander intended, but I disagree with your opinion. Big words don't change my stance if there is no evidence or meaning behind them.

See, you are a terrible clue player, you make accusations and then bail when you get called out on it. You cannot be a very good detective when you base everyone on circumstantial evidence that flies in the face of logic.

Just because the right wing have rights that need upholding it doesn't mean that you have a great understanding of who truly controls the world and pulls it's strings. Learn and listen.

Ok yes sir 🫡

I’m very sorry sir 🫡

No shots were fired. @TheWolfMaster37 has their opinion and thinks that there was no evidence. 1st Amendment. Speaking of evidence, I see none in your case. Not even any circumstantial evidence, which you seem so critical of. No slander intended to you, but I find fault in your case.

There have been multiple extremely vocal and aggressive left wing people who attack others for not having the same opinions about equality and border control, so I know for a fact that you are lying about the evidence, just like a typical politician and freemason. I've had more than enough reason to fire back at you, so don't complain about the contempt and hatred that you receive when you act in an abusive manner. You are coming up with finger pointing tactics and contradictory statements because you cannot prove your erroneous view.

Denial, blatant lying and ignorance will not help to maintain your position so don't try glossing over the facts. If you weren't there to witness what went on you shouldn't be allowed to speak about it.

Straying away from the main topic doesn't help your case. I am trying to say that no large-scale evidence about moderators being biased has been shown by you. No words about the outside world. If you made the first move by vocalizing your concerns about the mods, then it should be backed up by proof. This is in no way trying to silence you by any means, however I have the opinion that you have not shown an argument which actually helps your statement. Most of these concerns have been backed up before, which makes me question if you actually read the rebuttals.

Again, if there are facts, show them. This is an open invitation. Until then, stop trying to dodge the question. This is not supposed to be a political debate, just a response to your statement.

Mmmm. Ad hominem. To prove that I did not know logic you completely ignored my argument and attacked me again. How did you shoot my argument down? You didn't. You attacked me again.