I am a fruit.
The Semi-Official Goofing Off Thread
Sort:
Ya I saw that
I saw chess
I saw ches then chess
For what
That hurts man
I hurt man
You created the thread for the purpose of "goofing off," so you don't need to create another thread to fulfill the purpose..........
Most would consider "goofing off" to be a form of self-entertainment, and creating this thread does not help the cause one way or another.
hitthepin wrote:
I will honestly be so surprised if this thread makes it to the third page without me talking to myself far more than I would like.
I think we are good on that!
"94 new" hmm
Sep 11, 2018
0
#95
Junebug444 wrote:
You created the thread for the purpose of "goofing off," so you don't need to create another thread to fulfill the purpose..........
Most would consider "goofing off" to be a form of self-entertainment, and creating this thread does not help the cause one way or another.
I know. But you can’t really lecture me after you posted that game and analysis in Game Showcase. BTW that was hilarious. 🤣
hitthepin wrote:
Junebug444 wrote:
You created the thread for the purpose of "goofing off," so you don't need to create another thread to fulfill the purpose..........
Most would consider "goofing off" to be a form of self-entertainment, and creating this thread does not help the cause one way or another.
I know. But you can’t really lecture me after you posted that game and analysis in Game Showcase. BTW that was hilarious. 🤣
Mmmmm, I want to counter the statement, but I’m flattered, so I won’t. 
hitthepin wrote:
“A king sac on g5”.
I couldn’t stop laughing. Literally.
Lel
hitthepin wrote:
“A king sac on g5”.
I couldn’t stop laughing. Literally.
NO, you got it all wrong, if you king sac on g5, the opponent can decline it by sacking his OWN king on f2, followed by a archbishop sac on z99.
Then what are you