Upset you lost on time?
I don't see how people play bullet. I have a hard enough time in blitz. Too bad you missed the mate in 2 starting with move 37 (there were some earlier mates too, that was just the first one that caught my eye when going through the game).
Aha, only now I realise you're a troll!
Crucify him!
This is a bullet game. Bullet is a legal-move making contest more so than a chess game. It doesn't matter how you win, as long as you do.
You have only yourself to blame for not checkmating your opponent in this game. Use a little more of your time to find the forced mate, as opposed to just playing a safe checks instantly and letting him run all over the board.
Publicly complaining shows a profound lack of understanding. Play longer games if you're not happy about losing on time. When you choose to play a 1-minute game you have no right to complain about quality.
It's because people play with an anticipation of respect for opponents and the game.. people however weasel out of that respect and do "whatever it takes" on the board to win the game. Essentially being non-ethical and disrespectful to themselves and the game.. but the people who are hte leaders of the community allow it.
It's because people play with an anticipation of respect for opponents and the game..
Not in 1-minute they don't. It's all about the clock.
If you want to work on your chess game, and have time for chatting with your opponent & having a drink of tea, try playing 15-minute instead.
You should expect that whenever you play any form of fast chess. Consider playing longer time controls so that you don't have this issue? If not, then why are you even here?
It's because people play with an anticipation of respect for opponents and the game.. people however weasel out of that respect and do "whatever it takes" on the board to win the game. Essentially being non-ethical and disrespectful to themselves and the game.. but the people who are hte leaders of the community allow it.
.. and why exactly did you choose to play bullet chess if you wanted these expectations to be upheld? It seems like your only issue is not understanding the nuances of the different versions of chess available to be played. I play blitz, almost exclusively, (usually 5 or 10 min) and I find that to be much more strategically involved rather than being strictly-clocked based like in bullet. I actually hate winning on time if my opponent has any significant advantage- if it's even or I'm winning, then your clock is your own responsibility to manage- but if I am being truly beaten and the opponent is running out of time I will offer a draw purely out of respect for the integrity of the game. Your complalints are all nullified by the fact that you chose to play bullet. Try a different mode.
THIS IS THE CHESS POLICE. COME OUT WITH YOUR HANDS UP. WE'VE GOT THE THREAD SURROUNDED.
They'll never take me alive! YOU WOULDN'T SHOOT AN UNARMED CHESS PLAYER WOULD YA COPPAR?
OP spend more time on tactics trainer and less trolling and whining, maybe you'll be happier with the site
guy is pullin yer legs. ain't nobody got time to be that bad at chess.
You only have yourself to blame OP.
Because he is Overall Perfection?
Well played, sir!
holy thread resurrection, Batman!
holy thread resurrection, Batman!
And only for the purpose of providing more proof that he is not proficient enough at chess to be playing under such strict time constraints. And this is coming from a beginner player who is awful, but I am at least trying to learn the right way. Also, a brief look at his game history will show not only multiple losses to the computer set on easy, but the great majority of his live game wins came from him winning on time himself- hypocrisy is a sign of poor character, which is ironic for someone who uses sentiments such as "integrity" in his complaints. He's not making threads complaining about the "integrity of the game" after those matches he won on time, now is he? I can't tell if he's a troll or just plain stupid.
http://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=1144030305