turned into a Diddy party
Sort:
5 days ago
0
#4
BaylorElkinsWiffleBallYT wrote:
NeoChess9 wrote:
Did you use assist
What on gods earth is assist again? I forgot.
S-T-O-C-K-F-I-S-H
5 days ago
0
#6
BaylorElkinsWiffleBallYT wrote:
NeoChess9 wrote:
Your brain is nowhere near stock
Then how the chess did I just beat Sensei, Magnus, and Hikaru bots 3 CROWNS?!?!
Then, how the chess did you get on a losing streak if your brain is “10x better than stockfish?”
5 days ago
0
#7
BaylorElkinsWiffleBallYT wrote:
Here is proof!
Stockfish proof indeed
5 days ago
0
#8
BaylorElkinsWiffleBallYT wrote:
Commando_Droid wrote:
BaylorElkinsWiffleBallYT wrote:
Here is proof!
Stockfish proof indeed
Never thought an IM would talk to me outside of tournaments. Wow!
He does, and why would a GM be surprised about this? If you’re so “Good at chess”, why don’t you challenge Gukesh D?
Just share a screenshot
I don't know the bot as I don't play built-in AIs but - pretty sure stockfish or other engine was used in here. I'm a horrible player (only 2500 blitz), so I must say it is above my imagination. Nf5 was weird but somewhat understandable, however had you known how to play chess you wouldn't play Kg5 on move 70. Typical for engines, any human would instantly play f4, but the engine sometimes misses simple plans. Secondly, no human would play Kf1-Ke1. Also that against magnus bot. Frankly speaking, cringe. And yeah, if all you want from life is to get 30 seconds of attention from random people, be that an im or not, for being a cheater then maybe it's time to reconsider life choices.
lobk2k wrote:
had you known how to play chess you wouldn't play Kg5 on move 70. Typical for engines, any human would instantly play f4, but the engine sometimes misses simple plans.
Guess what the engine's top choice is. Yes, it's 70. f4.
Why would an engine miss a simple plan?
magipi wrote:
Guess what the engine's top choice is. Yes, it's 70. f4.
Why would an engine miss a simple plan?
Why would an engine miss a simple plan?
Depends on the depth (thus time you let it to calculate). Stockfish uses shortcuts called heuristics to decide which moves to look at first. These help it search millions of positions quickly, but sometimes a winning move might get skipped. If it doesn’t search deep enough, or if the position is tricky, it might miss something obvious to a human. Search depth and speed is dependent on your processor. Phones have much worse performance so if you'd pair the same engine on pc and phone, the pc would win. Therefore it is possible, and quite likely in my opinion, he used engine on a low-performance device. Additionally, at times it just doesn't understand certain positions.
just talk