Voluminous amounts of content have disappeared!

Sort:
Avatar of xlote

This from our President today (from multiple sources):

From Obama’s pitch for his Iran deal today: Just because Iranian hardliners chant “Death to America” does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe. In fact, it’s those . . . (APPLAUSE) In fact, it’s those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hardliners chanting “Death to America” who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican Caucus.

Thus the great uniter speaks!  This could be a good Republican debate question - "Do you want Death for America?"  "No? Prove it!"

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

     Excuse me for being blunt, but I think your in the wrong forum xlote.Undecided Definitely the wrong thread

Avatar of Commander_Riker

LOL Isn't this the off topic forum. Dang took a wrong turn somewhere :)

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

       wait, wait, we can save it!   Undecided   Its possible THE IRANIANS stole the Voluminus content Jamie D is looking forSmile    pheu, THAT was closeEmbarassed  Thank God you were here Dr.                                                    

Avatar of Commander_Riker

:) LOL

Avatar of JamieDelarosa
xlote wrote:

This from our President today (from multiple sources):

From Obama’s pitch for his Iran deal today: Just because Iranian hardliners chant “Death to America” does not mean that that’s what all Iranians believe. In fact, it’s those . . . (APPLAUSE) In fact, it’s those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It’s those hardliners chanting “Death to America” who have been most opposed to the deal. They’re making common cause with the Republican Caucus.

Thus the great uniter speaks!  This could be a good Republican debate question - "Do you want Death for America?"  "No? Prove it!"

Dennis Prager has the correct position on the issue:

"We are re-living 1938."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4FkNbtkgps&feature=youtu.be

Avatar of bordlyron

This is a much stronger approach than Chamberlain took with Hitler. We are negotiating from both military and economic superiority. Vast superiority on both counts. Wasn't the case in 1938. Was in about 1934, when action should have been taken. I believe the proper analog is the latter.