At one point a chicken's ancestor (let's call it chocken) would lay an egg which contains the first chicken. Now would you call that a "chocken's egg" or chickens egg?
If it's a chocken's egg, the the chicken came first. If it's a chicken's egg, the egg came first.
I personally think it's a chocken's egg so I say the chicken came first but it's more of a philosophical question than a scientific one.
Yes, but the whose’ egg it is isn’t specified. I get your point, though.
Yes, but the whose’ egg it is isn’t specified. I get your point, though.
If the OP means egg in common then it takes the win by a long shot. But the usual dilemma is chicken's egg vs chicken.
Yes, but the whose’ egg it is isn’t specified. I get your point, though.
If the OP means egg in common then it takes the win by a long shot. But the usual dilemma is chicken's egg vs chicken.
Yeah. That’s why I typed the second sentence.
ggE
Guys it is easy.
Here we are not talking about chicken egg any egg like dinosaurs who came before chicken.
So egg came firsr
gg3
if you mean specifically chicken eggs, i would say the chicken
if you mean just eggs in general, the egg
First came the earth
chicken 🐔