What is ♾️+i?

Sort:
Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

i being the "imaginary unit." Also known as the square root of, -1.

Avatar of MxC2031
The_Mathemagician1 wrote:

i being the "imaginary unit." Also known as the square root of, -1.

idk

Avatar of Jomsup

Let give infinity + (i) = X

Then (infinity + (i))² = X²

infinity² + 2(i)(infinity) + i² = X²

infinity + 2(i)(infinity) -1 = X²

infinity + 2(i)infinity = X²

2th root of p+qi is equal ±(a+bi) when a² = 0.5( p+[p²+q²]⁰'⁵ ) and b² = 0.5( -x+ [p²+q²]⁰'⁵ ) and 2abq > 0

So from the infinity + 2(i)infinity = X² will get

a² = 0.5( infinity + [infinity² + (2infinity)²]⁰'⁵ ) = infinity

a = ± infinity

b² = 0.5( -infinity + [infinity² + (2infinity)²]⁰'⁵ ). from the initial polynomial distribution make in this expression make infinity~infinity (only this equation*), so [infinity² + 4(infinity)]⁰'⁵ ~ [infinity² + 4(infinity) + 4]⁰'⁵ ~ [(infinity+2)²]⁰'⁵ = infinity+2. So b² ~ 0.5(-infinity + (infinity+2)) ~ 1

b => Real number (give b=R~1)

From 2abq > 0 ; 2a(R)(2infinity). So a>0 ~ infinity

Therefore a±bi = ± [infinity + R(i)] = infinity ± (R)i

CONCLUDE : "infinity + i" is already in simple form.

Avatar of Jomsup

I can say thay infinity is not equal to infinity+(i) because infinity is the extension of real numbers only. So complex numbers are a much and much larger number system. so that the result of infinity+(i) is definitely not in the scope (or extension) of real numbers.

Or if you insert a complex number into the 2D perpendicular coordinates, you will find that this number is definitely not equal.

Avatar of DragonGamer231

Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1
DragonGamer231 wrote:

Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.

Why don't you Google it yourself?

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

No, way!

https://www.google.com/search?q=tan+90&oq=&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j6j0i512l7.5744j0j4&client=ms-android-verizon&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Avatar of 1a3

Infinity+i = infinty, anything added  to or subtracted from infinty still stays infinity

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

Infinity i+i=infinity i

Infinity i+1 just equals infinity i plus 1.

infinity i+x, when x is a real number, remains infinity i+x.

It is a stain to type on the cell phone, so quit wasting my time.

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

Are you all this bad at testing your theories to failure, when over the Chess Board?

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

Infinity+i=ComplexInfinity

Infinity i+1 is still ComplexInfinity

There are exactly 8 times as many numbers in the Complex number set, as there are Reals.

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

The Largest Possible Complex Infinities are +/-infinity, +/-infinity i

+/-infinity+/-infinity i 

Avatar of DragonGamer231
The_Mathemagician1 wrote:
DragonGamer231 wrote:

Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.

Why don't you Google it yourself?

Apparently, tan(90) simplifies to 1/0, so the simplified equation is 1/0=3/0. I do think these are equivalent, but since both do not have a defined answer, I can't be certain.

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1
The_Mathemagician1 wrote:

Infinity+i=ComplexInfinity

Infinity i+1 is still ComplexInfinity

There are exactly 8 times as many numbers in the Complex number set, as there are Reals.

Four times as many if you compute both infinity, and -infinity

Avatar of The_Mathemagician1

Nope.

According to that link I shared it computes to this.

 -1.99520041221

Where did you get "1/0" from?

Avatar of Jomsup
The_Mathemagician1 wrote:

Nope.

According to that link I shared it computes to this.

 -1.99520041221

Where did you get "1/0" from?

I think @DragonGamer231 means tan(90 degree) = 1/0

However tan(90) = tan(90 radian) = -1.9952...

Avatar of Jomsup
The_Mathemagician1 wrote:

Are you all this bad at testing your theories to failure, when over the Chess Board?

These numbers are beyond my imagination. I'm not sure my proof is correct. I'm proving that it's an incremental polynomial (Think of X as a variable and the rest as constants) that cannot be attenuated in a infinity complex number system.