i being the "imaginary unit." Also known as the square root of, -1.
idk
Let give infinity + (i) = X
Then (infinity + (i))² = X²
infinity² + 2(i)(infinity) + i² = X²
infinity + 2(i)(infinity) -1 = X²
infinity + 2(i)infinity = X²
2th root of p+qi is equal ±(a+bi) when a² = 0.5( p+[p²+q²]⁰'⁵ ) and b² = 0.5( -x+ [p²+q²]⁰'⁵ ) and 2abq > 0
So from the infinity + 2(i)infinity = X² will get
a² = 0.5( infinity + [infinity² + (2infinity)²]⁰'⁵ ) = infinity
a = ± infinity
b² = 0.5( -infinity + [infinity² + (2infinity)²]⁰'⁵ ). from the initial polynomial distribution make in this expression make infinity~infinity (only this equation*), so [infinity² + 4(infinity)]⁰'⁵ ~ [infinity² + 4(infinity) + 4]⁰'⁵ ~ [(infinity+2)²]⁰'⁵ = infinity+2. So b² ~ 0.5(-infinity + (infinity+2)) ~ 1
b => Real number (give b=R~1)
From 2abq > 0 ; 2a(R)(2infinity). So a>0 ~ infinity
Therefore a±bi = ± [infinity + R(i)] = infinity ± (R)i
CONCLUDE : "infinity + i" is already in simple form.
I can say thay infinity is not equal to infinity+(i) because infinity is the extension of real numbers only. So complex numbers are a much and much larger number system. so that the result of infinity+(i) is definitely not in the scope (or extension) of real numbers.
Or if you insert a complex number into the 2D perpendicular coordinates, you will find that this number is definitely not equal.
Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.
Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.
Why don't you Google it yourself?
Infinity i+i=infinity i
Infinity i+1 just equals infinity i plus 1.
infinity i+x, when x is a real number, remains infinity i+x.
It is a stain to type on the cell phone, so quit wasting my time.
Infinity+i=ComplexInfinity
Infinity i+1 is still ComplexInfinity
There are exactly 8 times as many numbers in the Complex number set, as there are Reals.
Do you know if tan(90)=3/0 is a true statement? I did ask this on the other thread, but I fear it got lost among the other replies.
Why don't you Google it yourself?
Apparently, tan(90) simplifies to 1/0, so the simplified equation is 1/0=3/0. I do think these are equivalent, but since both do not have a defined answer, I can't be certain.
Infinity+i=ComplexInfinity
Infinity i+1 is still ComplexInfinity
There are exactly 8 times as many numbers in the Complex number set, as there are Reals.
Four times as many if you compute both infinity, and -infinity
Nope.
According to that link I shared it computes to this.
-1.99520041221
Where did you get "1/0" from?
Nope.
According to that link I shared it computes to this.
-1.99520041221
Where did you get "1/0" from?
I think @DragonGamer231 means tan(90 degree) = 1/0
However tan(90) = tan(90 radian) = -1.9952...
Are you all this bad at testing your theories to failure, when over the Chess Board?
These numbers are beyond my imagination. I'm not sure my proof is correct. I'm proving that it's an incremental polynomial (Think of X as a variable and the rest as constants) that cannot be attenuated in a infinity complex number system.
i being the "imaginary unit." Also known as the square root of, -1.