Who would like to have a pleasant discussion about an interesting paradox I thought of?

Maybe something like this was already thought of, but I was thinking about this for a while, being a deep person.

My thought: Assuming time travel is possible in the future, if someone shouted, "I will remember this moment for the rest of my life to time travel to myself!" But the thing is, if you will remember it for the rest of your life, then you have to keep on thinking on it forever. If you do decide to do that however, then why didn't (the future) you didn't appear to yourself? I remember a moment in my life where I randomly thought, "I will remember this for the rest of my life." So if I decide that if time travel is possible in the future and available to me, then I will travel to myself back then. But since I didn't see my future self back then, I must conclude that either:

A. Time travel was not available to me,

B. I was too lazy,

C. This is the first world/dimension, and there is no future parallel universe, this being the beginning of infinite parallel universes. Because if you time travel to yourself, you are either creating a dimension or you are going into an already existing dimension. Then when me from the past grows up, I will time travel to myself and so on and so forth.

If I decide that no matter the cost, I WILL time travel to myself and not be lazy, then it narrows it down to 2 solutions. So, therefore I conclude that either,

A. Time travel is not available to me,

B. We are living in the first parallel universe.

(C. Both.)

Any thoughts on this? 

I doubt that anyone will understand this tbh. I only understand it slightly.

Are there any flaws with my deep thought?

If you would like, we could misdirect this forum to the topic of cheese, or maybe chess.

Ok, final bump. I've run out of things to say.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/will-you-help-me-56510784

Bruh, don't advertise on my forum.

I guess no one can understand, because I am too big-brained for all of you 

K. If no one responds to my (excellent) forums, maybe I'll make a bunch of alt accounts and respond to them myself!

Time travel just isn't possible, not without the use of a wormhole (black hole but presumeably with the ability to bend space-time), which humans can't go near, so this renders your whole argument useless.

There are other things wrong with this too:

One theory in Quantum Physics suggests that no matter what, different actions where you must choose an option will always branch out to create a parallel universe, meaning there can always be a future parallel universe.

Also this is illegal.

Oh yeah and stop begging for attention no one is going to respect you for that.

I know time travel isn't possible, but now we double know time travel is fake. If what you say about parallel universes are true, then I just proved that time travel is fake.

Yesss, it is, also why?

Yeah, how is this illegal. Several people have said they made alt accounts, and they aren't banned.

Oka

Wdym begging for attention. I'm just trying to share some half-decent thoughts about paradoxes.

Mods aren't the best at their jobs, but it is against the ToS.

They are good ideas, but you push at them.

Ok, I was joking about getting an alt account.