why am i getting ignored?
RedGirlZ reminds me of the arguments I used to have with my sister, even if you manage to win them, they somehow gonna make you pay.
But u haven't won anything. And if ur comparing urself to an annoying little sister then yes thats accurate
Actually I was comparing you to my annoying sister, how you could have failed to grasp it, I cannot say.
For someone that claims to be logical and positive you're sure very negative and illogical.
So you were a world war one flying ace that flew with the Red Barron, he had a red aeroplane and you have red hair, makes sense! 
RedGrirlZ makes smiley face, its all over now, nothing more to say, she so not gloomy any more.
what are u even on about, ur smoking something.
Please don't make me explain, have mercy.
I dont need u to explain, cuz ur talking random sentences. When did i say was in any arm or world war 1 etc what are u on.
You need to understand what an argumentum ad verecundiam, appeal to authority is. Its true because I say its true or in your case, I am not gloomy because I say I am not gloomy, On that same basis you could tell us anything and we would be expected to believe it.
what are u even on about, ur smoking something.
Please don't make me explain, have mercy.
I dont need u to explain, cuz ur talking random sentences. When did i say was in any arm or world war 1 etc what are u on.
trying to vilify other people with vacuous attempts of "what are you on", "what have you been smoking" is not helping you, it merely demonstrates that you have not understood what has transpired.
You need to understand what an argumentum ad verecundiam, appeal to authority is. Its true because I say its true or in your case, I am not gloomy because I say I am not gloomy, On that same basis you could tell us anything and we would be expected to believe it
Hang on aren't u being hypocritical. You say I'm gloomy hence I am? I have to take ur word for it? Get out of here with ur intellectual inconsistency.
Actually NO because I cited your avatar which appears to me to be gloomy and asked for evidence of your non gloominess, in both cases I have made an appeal to empirical evidence. Give it up, you can't touch this.
vilify? All I said was what u said doesn't make sense. The only person here who doesn't understand is you.
Actually you have insinuated that my reasoning is based on being inebriated with drugs, what have you been smoking, what are you on etc if that is not an attempt at vilification, what is it?
someone please call 911
A figure of speech, ok, I can accept that, seems reasonable.
Can't touch this, face it.
that's right, its sooo untouchable., pure unassailable logic.
actually YES, go read back you tried to comment that I'm generally a gloomy person on chess.com, and now ur trying to say my face is gloomy, neither of which is the case. Ur arguments aren't backed up by legitimate evidence this is just one of those arguments of "U are, I'm not." Get it through ur head that Just because I don't have a huge list of evidence in front of me to counter u doesn't mean ur right. I'm not a weirdo i don't go around saving evidence of whenever I'm negative or positive.
Anyway I now believe you not to be so gloomy and managed to winkle out of you a happy face, it wasn’t easy but even Scrooge was forced to give a turkey away eventually. 
It's an emoji, it means nothing.
Every time you say that another fairy dies!
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Amen!