but it was not more than one, ask anybody who was active in the thread b4 it was censored
even if it was only one thats still too much. really nobody should be saying any slurs at all, no amount is excusable why are you trying to defend this
im not one to start things on forums like this but still, it just seems odd that youre trying to defend racism ..?
you are so based rhys!!! 
No, I am telling the second time that I am not defending it. I completely agree that what he did was wrong and he should have known that it was a slur. I never supported racism. But the thing is, the OP has said a lie that the guy had said 3 slurs, which is a lie, as he had said one word, which I presume was unintentional, knowing the person being accused is a person that would never support racism.
to #53
maybe because he thought it was an "internet slang", I know woolly, he would never promote racism
lies, slurs aunt something that could be "internet slang" ion any matter
that's not how slurs work
See, I told you
what could that word possibly mean in another context that it would be a slur in another context? there no word that's a racial slur, that also is a word used for something else.
what could that word possibly mean in another context that it would be a slur in another context? there no word that's a racial slur, that also is a word used for something else.
You would get what we are trying to say if you knew what the word was.
See? I was not defending racism, I was defending a person being falsely accused of racism.
but it was not more than one, ask anybody who was active in the thread b4 it was censored
even if it was only one thats still too much. really nobody should be saying any slurs at all, no amount is excusable why are you trying to defend this
im not one to start things on forums like this but still, it just seems odd that youre trying to defend racism ..?