Chess.com should have a 0 tolerance policy for public cheating accusations
Sort:
Oct 27, 2025
0
#42
I would explain why this is totally unreasonable, but honestly this is probably a troll post and not worth wasting my time on.
it is all about the money if they did what you suggest they would lose half the people who play here, go broke and have to shut down. Have you tried muting people who post that or better yet just ignore them?
number of accounts banned , "First 3 months of 2025
314,000
This included 34 titled players." what is the point in even playing?
Oct 28, 2025
0
#46
pawnforall-is-innocent wrote:
The ban on pawnforall embodies the perilous presumption of guilt, rather than innocence. I was banned without clear evidence, and the burden of proof has unfairly shifted to me. I demand that Chess.com adhere to the principle that it is "better to let ten guilty persons escape than to convict one innocent person." My consistent play, documented learning journey, and transparent interactions all speak to my innocence. This platform must ensure that no player is xguiltxy simply due to a statistical anomaly or malicious reporting. I demand my immediate reinstatement and a clear commitment to the presumption of innocence for all users.
If you had an account closed, you should have received an email with an option to appeal the closure. Appeals are rarely granted and the site estimate is there's less than a 0.3% false positive rate.
https://www.chess.com/cheating#false-positives
Oct 28, 2025
0
#47
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
sawdof wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Any public cheating accusation should lead to an instant account closure.
Otherwise they show that they don't really care about Daniel Naroditsky at all.
If they do, they don't really care about kramnik. Because everything is about these two. If you chomp on hanging pieces, you're bullying and you don't really care about Danya.
are you trolling? kramnik should be reprimanded for all his constant cyberbullying. and how is chomping on hanging pieces bullying?
I think if anything, not chomping on hanging pieces is bullying
pawnforall-is-innocent wrote:
My account (pawnforall) was banned without due process.
Fun fact: the pawnforall account is not banned.
https://www.chess.com/member/pawnforall
Oct 29, 2025
0
#49
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
sawdof wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Any public cheating accusation should lead to an instant account closure.
Otherwise they show that they don't really care about Daniel Naroditsky at all.
If they do, they don't really care about kramnik. Because everything is about these two. If you chomp on hanging pieces, you're bullying and you don't really care about Danya.
are you trolling? kramnik should be reprimanded for all his constant cyberbullying. and how is chomping on hanging pieces bullying?
I think if anything, not chomping on hanging pieces is bullying
That doesn't make any sense. No amount of reasoning can make it make sense.
PlayerIDC wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
sawdof wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Any public cheating accusation should lead to an instant account closure.
Otherwise they show that they don't really care about Daniel Naroditsky at all.
If they do, they don't really care about kramnik. Because everything is about these two. If you chomp on hanging pieces, you're bullying and you don't really care about Danya.
are you trolling? kramnik should be reprimanded for all his constant cyberbullying. and how is chomping on hanging pieces bullying?
I think if anything, not chomping on hanging pieces is bullying
That doesn't make any sense. No amount of reasoning can make it make sense.
It's the Chewbacca defense. Chompy always uses it, and it always works.
funny how me and my supporters have dramatically higher ratings on average than the people who continue to call me a troll. maybe if you guys stopped accusing me of trolling you would improve your chess.
Oct 29, 2025
0
#53
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
funny how me and my supporters have dramatically higher ratings on average than the people who continue to call me a troll. maybe if you guys stopped accusing me of trolling you would improve your chess.
Engines are higher rated than people, too. Who knew.
Oct 29, 2025
0
#54
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
funny how me and my supporters have dramatically higher ratings on average than the people who continue to call me a troll. maybe if you guys stopped accusing me of trolling you would improve your chess.
Engines are higher rated than people, too. Who knew.
Are you trying to provide examples of the type of thing that there should be a zero tolerance towards?
Oct 29, 2025
0
#55
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
... if you guys stopped accusing me of trolling you would improve your chess.
Material for a new topic, even book
"Stop accusing, start winning"
Oct 30, 2025
0
#57
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
funny how me and my supporters have dramatically higher ratings on average than the people who continue to call me a troll. maybe if you guys stopped accusing me of trolling you would improve your chess.
That proves nothing 💀
Oct 30, 2025
0
#58
Hahahah tell that to Vladimir Kramnik and Daniel Naroditsky's family LOL
Oct 30, 2025
0
#59
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Unless they are trolls you can accuse trolls of cheating
Hangeypiecechomper is still in denile about him being a troll
how am I a troll when I'm 2500 on this site?
vladimir kramnik is a grandmaster, and former world champ, how could he be a troll?
Oct 30, 2025
0
#60
NerdyNoobyGoofball wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
Unless they are trolls you can accuse trolls of cheating
Hangeypiecechomper is still in denile about him being a troll
how am I a troll when I'm 2500 on this site?
vladimir kramnik is a grandmaster, and former world champ, how could he be a troll?
that being said you aren't a troll.
are you trolling? ...
Are you? Equating chess.com caring about Danya to agreeing with your demands?