Chess.com should really disclose what Community Guideline Violation you broke when you get muted.

Sort:
OneThousandEightHundred18

I'd like a reason why my thread trying to get put in charge or chess.com was locked after 11 days being open with no explanation. I had valid points and was being 100% serious.

HangingPiecesChomper

i thought you were admitting it was a troll parody thread?

TheMidnightExpress12
long_quach wrote:

@TheMidnightExpress12

Everything in life works both ways.

You can protest by unsubscribing your paid membership.

Money talks, they say.

I never paid chess.com a dime. If they fix their system then i may consider it

OneThousandEightHundred18

My thread was not a troll parody thread. I was being just as serious as veryverystern and feel strongly that I should be in charge.

HangingPiecesChomper

well nobody should take you seriously then. you have no qualifications to be in charge whatsoever.

Richard

Hi all! Just a brief heads up were monitoring this discussion and still interested in your thoughts. happy.png Keep the discussion healthy and please make realistic suggestions. I'm completely open to giving this feedback to the relevant teams to see if there is further ways we can continue to improve.

Warm regards,

Your friend and community peer,

Richard

Richard

@long_quach,

I haven't deleted any thread this evening, however if a member is closed for abuse and they happen to be the OP of a thread this will also remove the thread, so it's possible that this may also have happened.

TheMidnightExpress12

Chess.comis getting exposed.

AGC-Gambit_YT
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

i thought you were admitting it was a troll parody thread?

fr lol me too

OneThousandEightHundred18

Do you understand yet? If I just deny that I was trolling does that make it so? Is there anyone else on here who might be more of a troll than they admit to? 🤔

MGleason

In January, there were over 100K fair play bans and nearly 200K abuse bans: https://www.chess.com/article/view/chesscom-update-february-2025#FairPlay. Any proposals have to be practical to implement at scale. It's not practical to give a detailed personal message to every single banned account.

TheMidnightExpress12
MGleason wrote:

In January, there were over 100K fair play bans and nearly 200K abuse bans: https://www.chess.com/article/view/chesscom-update-february-2025#FairPlay. Any proposals have to be practical to implement at scale. It's not practical to give a detailed personal message to every single banned account.

Well just say what rule you broke when you get muted or banned, not even a detailed personal message. But when i get muted i dont get what rule i broke

Martin_Stahl
4PC-User wrote:

The Goal of Chess.com is adversting, get money, get Rich, get more user, get richer and when someone reports someone or say the "bad true about Chess.com" then everything is deleted 😶

The goal is to grow the game of Chess

The site does van and mute accounts but many times members get reported for issues that are not bannable of deserving of mutes.

MGleason
4PC-User wrote:

So I was banned 4 times because 1 time fair play= I teamed with my friend and the other times I haven't gotten any E-Mail with any reason. I think Chess.com is overpowered because when Chess.com thinks tht with more then 250M User you can ban everyone without reason then NO.

Which four accounts?

MGleason

The thing is, usually when someone is banned, they know why. Even if they don't know which specific rule they're violating, they generally know they're stirring up trouble.

And in terms of rule violations - often, it might not be any one single thing; it may well be the combination of multiple factors that make chess.com decide that enough is enough.

MGleason
4PC-User wrote:

The Goal of Chess.com is adversting, get money, get Rich, get more user, get richer and when someone reports someone or say the "bad true about Chess.com" then everything is deleted 😶

Banning people means less advertising revenue and no chance of you buying a premium membership. So chess.com would rather not ban you unless your behaviour is sufficiently negative that it creates an unpleasant experience for other people.

HangingPiecesChomper

as far as i know it's probably an automated system so they wouldn't know anything about it. if you get enough false reports you will get muted/banned no matter what.

Martin_Stahl
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

as far as i know it's probably an automated system so they wouldn't know anything about it. if you get enough false reports you will get muted/banned no matter what.

There are some automated systems but I don't believe any that ban for content related reason.

VerifiedChessYarshe

Kids these days couldn't accept the mute and ban and complain everytime. There are possibily millions of accounts which are banned/muted. Chess.com isn't gonna tell you "you got banned because you posted an inappropriate image (with the image) or "You are a predator" so they just didn't tell you the reason. If you want to know your reason, contact Support.

P.s: the OP wants a 10 mute streak, wonder why he would post this forum.

MGleason
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

as far as i know it's probably an automated system so they wouldn't know anything about it. if you get enough false reports you will get muted/banned no matter what.

I believe the only automated system that closes accounts is fair play-related, and maybe also the spam filter for spambots. Reports might trigger an investigation but would not in and of themselves lead to a ban.