I agree with you, 1 a day is way too limited especially for those who grind chess
game reviews should be free
Sort:
28 days ago
0
#43
Strongly disagree, the reason why you have to pay is because it helps pay for the servers as well. This is what allows us to use this website.
28 days ago
0
#44
wrote:
Ngl chess is becoming pay to win
That’s the most wild statement ever 😭
28 days ago
0
#45
Lucina_morningstar wrote:
Strongly disagree, the reason why you have to pay is because it helps pay for the servers as well. This is what allows us to use this website.
ya, also the money is used to feed there children, no mno food
28 days ago
0
#46
I can't agree more. Absolutely. Chess.com is way too greedy especially since it's already cemented itself as the #1 chess website. Put some consideration to poor people and children bruh. The one and only thing I absolutely hate chess.com for. Although there's this website called chessbase, 100x worse, so yea sometimes I forgive cc for this reason.
I agree. Its pretty annoying have to go to a third party site for free reviews
wrote:
Just use chessigna.com
What is that??? I use another one which i cant name for reasons
28 days ago
0
#50
If the OP text should be printed, it would have to be with a dot matrix printer.
28 days ago
0
#51
wrote:
wrote:
Just use chessigna.com
What is that??? I use another one which i cant name for reasons
Another website for game review, import ur chess.com username and you should be able to use it, but for some reason right now it doesn’t seem to be working
28 days ago
0
#52
Yukikaze wrote:
wrote:
wrote:
Just use chessigna.com
What is that??? I use another one which i cant name for reasons
Another website for game review, import ur chess.com username and you should be able to use it, but for some reason right now it doesn’t seem to be working
you mean that wincraft .uk or smth?
I’m conflicted on this one because one one hand it would be really nice, but at the same time, their main source of revenue is memberships, and let’s face it, game review is what everyone buys a membership for
28 days ago
0
#57
APersonWhoYoyos wrote:
I’m conflicted on this one because one one hand it would be really nice, but at the same time, their main source of revenue is memberships, and let’s face it, game review is what everyone buys a membership for
definitely disagree; if lichess.com could make money and sustain itself from donations alone, chess.com should do so as well. Parasitizing off of us poor people ain't nice.
57 the difference is lichess is run basically as a passion project, while cc is a business. And that’s ok, it just limits what they can do as they need to keep their stockholders interests and such in mind.
Also lichess does not make much money. That’s just not possible with their business model, ad revenue can only get you so far
28 days ago
0
#60
APersonWhoYoyos wrote:
57 the difference is lichess is run basically as a passion project, while cc is a business. And that’s ok, it just limits what they can do as they need to keep their stockholders interests and such in mind.
yea but chess.com being a for-profit company is really irritating fr. Literally EVERYTHING is business-oriented, and don't care as much about our thoughts compared to how much money they could make. Only good thing about chess.com tho, the staff is generally exceptionally hard working and nice, so yea if chess.com pays these people high salaries, then I'm fine with it (mostly). but if cc is spending money elsewhere then it's totally greedy.
Ngl chess is becoming pay to win
Yea especially at the higher level where people have strong Chess coaches tell them personally how to improve, but the good thing is more and more stuff is becoming free