game reviews should be free
Sort:
60 the one thing cc should do is pay their forum moderators. Ridiculous that it’s strictly volunteer for how much work they do
27 days ago
0
#62
APersonWhoYoyos wrote:
60 the one thing cc should do is pay their forum moderators. Ridiculous that it’s strictly volunteer for how much work they do
as for that point, I believe great mods like @Martin_Stahl could easily apply (and become) staff, but they chose not to, so its probably their decision. I'm not totally sure tho.
27 days ago
0
#64
Todorroki wrote:
Yh, so my membership would be useless then 😭
refund your money is what cc should do
27 days ago
0
#67
aayu_fx wrote:
Chess.wintrcat.uk
Is this more accurate than chess.com's game review? I would assume so since it takes longer, but I feel better about my poor play when I put games into it, since it bumps what would be a depressing 70% to a respectable 80-85+. Is it that chess.com only focuses on speed rather than accuracy? Is it better?
Exotic-Blunders wrote:
aayu_fx wrote:
Is this more accurate than chess.com's game review? I would assume so since it takes longer, but I feel better about my poor play when I put games into it, since it bumps what would be a depressing 70% to a respectable 80-85+. Is it that chess.com only focuses on speed rather than accuracy? Is it better?
no analysis engine is better than chess.com's i believe
Lucina_morningstar wrote:
Strongly disagree, the reason why you have to pay is because it helps pay for the servers as well. This is what allows us to use this website.
dawg fym they pay for their servers, latency is like 400 ms on average 💀
Lucina_morningstar wrote:
Strongly disagree, the reason why you have to pay is because it helps pay for the servers as well. This is what allows us to use this website.
dude omg its exactly why they need to make it free, its their most useful feature and they put it behind a paywall
like why some of yall disagreeing with me, chess.com makes millions of dollars, you think one feature being free would harm them in anyway?
wrote:
APersonWhoYoyos wrote:
I’m conflicted on this one because one one hand it would be really nice, but at the same time, their main source of revenue is memberships, and let’s face it, game review is what everyone buys a membership for
definitely disagree; if lichess.com could make money and sustain itself from donations alone, chess.com should do so as well. Parasitizing off of us poor people ain't nice.
I agree
27 days ago
0
#74
wrote:
60 the one thing cc should do is pay their forum moderators. Ridiculous that it’s strictly volunteer for how much work they do
they paid dude, free membership for mods
ApologeticallyOval wrote:
wrote:
60 the one thing cc should do is pay their forum moderators. Ridiculous that it’s strictly volunteer for how much work they do
they paid dude, free membership for mods
Wow, 120-150 bucks a year. So generous.
200 bucks a year for like 50 mods is literally nothing compared to the millions they make a year
27 days ago
0
#79
MacDonalds should give me at least five free cheeseburgers per day too. Why not, they make millions of them.