JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
Ug I know who he is now
Is this site rigged to let you win on purpose?
Sort:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
Nov 16, 2024
0
#24
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
What do you expect to happen every time you make a new account and start trolling? If you actually cared about chess and your progress you’d use your account to be quiet and play chess, rather than being such an attention seeker. there’s only a few reasons why someone would care so little about their chess.com account at your level:
1) This is not their main account, violating chess.com’s rules around multiple accounts
2) They are using unconventional means to gain their rating and it’s not based on their actual skill
3) They’re so good at chess that they know they can reach 2200 in a week every time they make a new account (after getting banned for abuse and possible other misdemeanours) and yet choose not to pursue long-term improvement and/or professional chess.
So which is it?
No it is not
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
Man go challenge a 300 or something who cares if a cheater gets flagged in bullet 🤣
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
What do you expect to happen every time you make a new account and start trolling? If you actually cared about chess and your progress you’d use your account to be quiet and play chess, rather than being such an attention seeker. there’s only a few reasons why someone would care so little about their chess.com account at your level:
1) This is not their main account, violating chess.com’s rules around multiple accounts
2) They are using unconventional means to gain their rating and it’s not based on their actual skill
3) They’re so good at chess that they know they can reach 2200 in a week every time they make a new account (after getting banned for abuse and possible other misdemeanours) and yet choose not to pursue long-term improvement and/or professional chess.
So which is it?
have you thought that 2300 on this site is just easy to get?
you also sound like you're challenging me to a best out of 31 bullet match with desktop livestream, loser closes their account.
Yeah with millions of players only 7k people have 2300 in bullet, that's how "easy" it is to get 2300
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
What do you expect to happen every time you make a new account and start trolling? If you actually cared about chess and your progress you’d use your account to be quiet and play chess, rather than being such an attention seeker. there’s only a few reasons why someone would care so little about their chess.com account at your level:
1) This is not their main account, violating chess.com’s rules around multiple accounts
2) They are using unconventional means to gain their rating and it’s not based on their actual skill
3) They’re so good at chess that they know they can reach 2200 in a week every time they make a new account (after getting banned for abuse and possible other misdemeanours) and yet choose not to pursue long-term improvement and/or professional chess.
So which is it?
have you thought that 2300 on this site is just easy to get?
you also sound like you're challenging me to a best out of 31 bullet match with desktop livestream, loser closes their account.
Nah your computer is too rigged
basketstorm wrote:
Yeah with millions of players only 7k people have 2300 in bullet, that's how "easy" it is to get 2300
most of those players are not real, unless you want to tell me you think most players are 400 rated and are worse than somebody just starting to learn how to play.
Nov 16, 2024
0
#32
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
DoYouLikeCurry wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
JOK-E-R wrote:
He has passed accounts banned for fair play
sounds like you're challenging me to some bullet.
live stream desktop view, best out of 31, loser closes their account.
you want to keep accusing me, then you should have no problems accepting this challenge.
What do you expect to happen every time you make a new account and start trolling? If you actually cared about chess and your progress you’d use your account to be quiet and play chess, rather than being such an attention seeker. there’s only a few reasons why someone would care so little about their chess.com account at your level:
1) This is not their main account, violating chess.com’s rules around multiple accounts
2) They are using unconventional means to gain their rating and it’s not based on their actual skill
3) They’re so good at chess that they know they can reach 2200 in a week every time they make a new account (after getting banned for abuse and possible other misdemeanours) and yet choose not to pursue long-term improvement and/or professional chess.
So which is it?
have you thought that 2300 on this site is just easy to get?
you also sound like you're challenging me to a best out of 31 bullet match with desktop livestream, loser closes their account.
Technically speaking you’re correct, 2300 is easy to get under certain conditions. Though, of course, they’d be bannable conditions.
the other option, of course, is that 2300 is easy for you to get. In that case, my question is why you don’t push to be a properly good player? If you get to 2300 in a matter of days, why don’t you push for 2400? 2500? Higher still? Why not become a titled player? If your natural talent puts you at the same blitz rating as literally tonnes of master level players…
is it because you’re scared you’ll stop progressing so far? Is that why you get all your accounts banned so quick? So you never have to try? That’s…. Kinda sad
as for the bullet match: no, thank you. I’ve had my account for three years and am proud of my progress. I have no intention of deleting it. If you want to play, I’d be very happy to facilitate and otb match.
sawdof wrote:
Op needs to meet janko
They will be arguing forever
I could probably get to 2400 on this joke of a site but it would take too much grinding. I have nothing to prove already showing that 2300 on this site is a joke and can be obtained in a few days.
Nov 17, 2024
0
#36
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
I could probably get to 2400 on this joke of a site but it would take too much grinding. I have nothing to prove already showing that 2300 on this site is a joke and can be obtained in a few days.
Nothing to prove? There are more billionaires on the planet than Grandmasters. If you’ve got so much natural talent that you’re automatically in the top 0.1% of chess players, why not push for it? Cowardice? Laziness? Something else? Kinda sad tbh
Nov 20, 2024
0
#37
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
I could probably get to 2400 on this joke of a site but it would take too much grinding. I have nothing to prove already showing that 2300 on this site is a joke and can be obtained in a few days.
You're prob not even 200 without stockfish lmao
Khnemu_Nehep wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
I could probably get to 2400 on this joke of a site but it would take too much grinding. I have nothing to prove already showing that 2300 on this site is a joke and can be obtained in a few days.
You're prob not even 200 without stockfish lmao
sounds like you're challenging me to a bullet match. loser closes their account?
edited moderator AndrewSmith