Lock, mute or ban

Sort:
idilis

No, this is not a game but it could well be.  How do mods decide what to do?

In the case below the poster @HandSanitize was not even muted but the post was locked for posterity so everyone can see it, which I think is worse.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/greta-thunberg-has-small-boobies

IMHO the poster should be banned. Their topics should show up on their page but not show the content.  This makes it clear why someone was banned for abuse.

idilis

Greta is a public figure so she's game for criticism on whatever she promotes. But she's not in the skin business or whatever one might call it. Just checked wiki and realized she's turned 19 - always thought of her as a mid teen.

Now I'm all for poking fun at anything and everything but I guess there are some lines not to cross at least on a chess site.

idilis

A lock just puts a topic in the must see section in the museum of chess.com.

UpbeatAngle

I edited the offending title.

 

idilis
UpbeatAngle wrote:

I edited the offending title.

Why not mute the already closed account?

Wits-end

No question here. REMOVE IT! It has no place here. Lately I’ve seen other pictures that seem appalling and offensive to me as well. I understand “time/place/manner” and we’re all different but this a chess site. And No, I’m not a prude, moral agent, or holier than thou. I don’t think I’ll stomach much more before I move on from Chess.com. 

idilis
NervesofButter wrote:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   No, I'm thinking more of the "family friendly" rule like Disney. 

disney hasnt been "family friendly" for decades.  They caved also to the PC crowd.

Only on the outside

idilis
NervesofButter wrote:
idilis wrote:
UpbeatAngle wrote:

I edited the offending title.

Why not mute the already closed account?

Better yet.  Why not give an answer as to why it was left up.

Muted now. Guessing a ban requires staff permission unlike mutes which even the autobots can do.

Wits-end

I will say Thank You to the staff for taking the recent corrective action. 

UpbeatAngle
NervesofButter wrote:
idilis wrote:
UpbeatAngle wrote:

I edited the offending title.

Why not mute the already closed account?

Better yet.  Why not give an answer as to why it was left up.

Mods are just members of the community so we don’t see all the content. After checking   I found other offensive content so it was removed. Thanks for sharing the concerns and for the thread!

There is a thread in community about becoming a mod.

Pegusu

It ABSOLUTELY should be REMOVED ASAP! 

idilis
NervesofButter wrote:
idilis wrote:

Muted now. Guessing a ban requires staff permission unlike mutes which even the autobots can do.

That'll be a 5 hour meeting on what to do and how not to offend the offender.

6 hours later still unbanned.

idilis
UpbeatAngle wrote:

*Snip* Thereis a thread in community about becoming a mod.

Responsibility without authority nor tools is a tough gig

idilis
RonaldJosephCote wrote:

   Here's another thread that has no business on Chess.com.  The big surprise is its from 2016...    Really?....teach a 3 yr old how to use a chain-saw?   Another re-turning troll.                                                            https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/should-i-teach-my-3-year-old-chess-or-how-to-use-a-chainsaw

That account @I_Shalt_HumiliateYou lasted a couple of months before self closing after getting humiliated

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/what-prison-is-this

But at least from what I can see he wasn't attacking anyone

idilis

Guess we will just keep lowering the bar slowly but surely 😉

idilis

How much more of a pattern does the site need to take action on @worstertatersneako?


SomedayGM221
idilis wrote:

No, this is not a game but it could well be. How do mods decide what to do?

In the case below the poster @HandSanitize was not even muted but the post was locked for posterity so everyone can see it, which I think is worse.

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/greta-thunberg-has-small-boobies

IMHO the poster should be banned. Their topics should show up on their page but not show the content. This makes it clear why someone was banned for abuse.

You are a prude and a stupid person to be honest. The fact words can get to you so much shows the weakness instilled in this generation. You are the one who should be banned

idilis
SomedayGM221 wrote:

You are a prude and a stupid person to be honest. The fact words can get to you so much shows the weakness instilled in this generation. You are the one who should be banned

Why be honest now? But I'm glad you know me so well.

I'm also glad that my words got to you enough to bump this after 27 days. That's some long term trigger

Roaming_Rooster

Since this was bumped I’ll contribute

An oldie but a goldie @Omshruti

12 year old illiterate lawyer/nationalist

idilis
Roaming_Rooster wrote:

Since this was bumped I’ll contribute

An oldie but a goldie @Omshruti

12 year old illiterate lawyer/nationalist

she was a comedian and she didn't even know it.