Petition to shadowban all under 500 rated players from chess.com forums

Sort:
PennsylvanianDude
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

Nobody should take anything PennsylvanianDude says seriously. a chicken and a troll.

yeah okay buddy

PennsylvanianDude

If you want to play a blitz or rapid game, I'll gladly accept.

BattleChessGN18
Honchkrow wrote:

Also this is what I'm talking about. All the low rated players on this forum post are shifting the discussion to whether or not pineapple belongs on pizza instead of my original post. This is why they need to be banned, it's too much effort to block every single one

BossAus2550 wrote:

They all think that everything is OTF

All you two are doing here is stereotyping; which is 5 times more childish than anyone who has gone off-topic in your thread.

Get it right, Bubbas: We're going off-topic not because we're "low-rated" players, but because no one takes the OP's trollish, puerile generalizations and hasted, erroneous reasoning seriously. Have you noticed that many to most National- and International-Master level players (~1500-2400?) who ventured into this thread are also amoung those who "discussed Pinapple Pizza"? It's because they don't care for your toppings, oo 'scuse me, topic nor reasoning; any more than we "off-topic low rated" players do.

BattleChessGN18
VerifiedChessYarshe wrote:
TheMidnightExpress12 wrote:
VerifiedChessYarshe wrote:
33_blackblackblackberry wrote:
VerifiedChessYarshe wrote:
BattleChessGN18 wrote:
veryverystern wrote:
BattleChessGN18 wrote:
veryverystern wrote:

I know its probably your time of the months now, but please, try to calm down and get back on topic.

And, right on cue comes in @VeryVeryStern. "Please try to calm down" and "get back on topic". Sounds familiar? Deju vu?

Ok yes, I own both accounts.

Go ahead and report me.

I already mentioned to you. According to chess.com rules, you are allowed to have two accounts; the second of which is used for training purposes.

Also, your sarcastic 'yeah, okay, okay. I have two accounts. Whatever' dismissive evasion will not deter my suspicion that these two accounts are yours.

Notice that, immediately, you already knew what I was talking about with your owning both accounts; when the multiple screen names elaboratively-discussed allegation was made to @VerifiedChessYarshe, not to @VeryVeryStern.

veryverystern wrote:

Now lets get back on topic.

No one cares about the OP's topic. Stop trying to dodge the fact that you were using two screen names to attempt to enumerate your side.

Again, I'm not an alt. If you feel like I'm breaking cc's rules then feel free to report what I violated. Its simple.

But instead you made a whole argument to say that I'm an illegal alt account despite being thrown with logically refuting.

Did you literally have to wait a few hours later to come back as "Verifiedchessyashe", just to avoid my cousin BattleChess's pointing out your "right on cue" entrances?

Can I have some sleep? Can I rest? Can I have a life outside instead spending my lifeless body on this site?

Are you @BattleChessGN18 alt as well? You just repeating his words.

No he's not. Stop spreading lies

Ah alright. But BattleChess seems triggered to invite his uncle . Also I'm not spreading lies, its a question.

Oh, my cousin is an adult "uncle" to you, isn't he? wink.png

Are you still hanging onto the frail recourse of ad hominem diatribes when you know you're in for an uphill battle?

In your own words (Under your @VeryVeryStern account): Grow up, dude.

VerifiedChessYarshe wrote:

@PennsylvanianDude public accusations aren't allowed. Report it privately.

Ha!

PennsylvanianDude

Okay, well the answer to that is no, 500 rated players should not be banned.

BattleChessGN18
veryverystern wrote:

The topic is: Petition to ban all under 500 rated players from chess.com forums

No one cares about "Petition to ban all under 500 rated players from chess.com forums".

It's not going to happen.

We don't care for your puerile generalizations about rated players.

We know you and your multiple sockpuppets are nothing more than a troll.

Get that through your thick head and stubborn neck.

We don't need to keep telling you. Alright?

No one cares!

No one cares to stay "on-topic" anymore. The discussion was already made.

veryverystern wrote:

Try to stay on it without getting personal....or the thread will be locked.

Oh, will it be locked, now? wink.png

Are you trying to encourage us "off-topic low-rated" players, now?

PennsylvanianDude
veryverystern wrote:

PennsylvanianGirl, you are not on any level to have a discussion with me. Direct your arguments to the op.

I am basically acting as a moderator here.

Yes, I know, I'm above you.

BattleChessGN18
veryverystern wrote:

I am basically acting as a moderator here.

Oh, lord, Stern/OP. How old are you really? Do you think anyone else actually agrees with your behavior?

I'll quote you verbatim again: "Grow up, dude."

Thisguyisgreat4

👌

BattleChessGN18
veryverystern wrote:

I’m telling you what the actual mods will do if the discussion strays into accusations and personal attacks.

I know. Most of us won't take it as a bad thing.

^^^Is what I'm trying to tell you.

veryverystern wrote:

Grow up.

You of all people continuing to try to say this... heh...

BattleChessGN18
veryverystern wrote:

Focus on the OP, stop begging for my attention, stay on topic.

That’s all I’m here to reinforce.

It's not working. All you're doing is creating clutter.

Thisguyisgreat4

true

BattleChessGN18
veryverystern wrote:

If you keep accusing and launching personal attacks, maybe you'll be the one who gets muted.

Oh, you would know this from experience, now, wouldn't you? heh.

PennsylvanianDude

500's should not be banned. I don't understand the argument to ban them. Banning 500's from a possible way to improve and have fun is not a good idea.

BattleChessGN18
PennsylvanianDude wrote:

500's should not be banned. I don't understand the argument to ban them. Banning 500's from a possible way to improve and have fun is not a good idea.

Sweety, all you're doing is repeating yourself. OP and his sockpuppets are not going to change "their" mind"s". You really should partake to better activities than to try to "teach a hippo to fly". "It doesn't work, and it annoys the hippo". wink.png

AndrewSmith

Keep on topic or this may get closed

Thisguyisgreat4

yeah

BattleChessGN18

Oh, under "@AndrewSmith" now....

***roll eyes***

Thisguyisgreat4

bruh

HangingPiecesChomper

I think we should have a forum section for 500s and below and restrict them from other sections.