i could crush a 200 blindfolded
Petition to shadowban all under 500 rated players from chess.com forums
Sort:
Apr 7, 2025
0
#1283
psy11116954 wrote:
Lets get serious. Saying anything towards anybody, affects them in a way. It can be bad or good, it depends on their mental level, values, perspective, and status in the hierarchy, and a lot of other factors.
If everything action is towards higher level of social interaction, thats right and formal, but not funny. Whats not funny, is boring.
Why would anyone ban a lot of "not boring" peoples from forums? Is chess considered a serious thing? If yes, im considering taking it very-very serious from now, as everything else in life.
One mistake, or error, any bad words, or action, or even bad thought whats not normal (we need 100% accurate normal and formal set and values for everything, first). Deserve jail, seriously.
Ye just jail everyone under, 200 IQ. Wait, IQ is relative, like time.
JAIL EVERYONE, UNDER, 2000 ELO.
JAIL EVERYONE WHO IS UNDER 2000 ELO MENTAL SET, IRL.
You are thinking about beating someone? Jail. You are thinking about doing war? Jail.
Read thoughts with AI, and chips. Jail everyone on a single bad synapse fireing. Jail everyone who eating any living organism. Eat air. Be like tree. Use energy from Sun, to live, new living form of Humans. Faster evolution, modify genes, to make Humans more friendly for their environment, and make them use Sun energy, and Air and Water only. Make a new form of living organism, what does nothing over the whole time of existence of the Universe.
Yes just keep all the physical laws 100%, be a particle instead a living organism from particles. BE. PERFECT. Think forward in all possible way, like Photons and wave fucntion do, to choose the best action every time.
BE SINGULARITY. Everything is connected, every particles, they have to see each other, so they can check each other, if someone is not perfectly doing the role, and the job, so they can correct each other, until the system reaches zero energy state and maximum error correction and entropy.
.
BE UNIVERSE. BE LIKE WATER. BE LIKE A PARTICLE. Everything will be fair, and draw. 50 / 50.
The only thing I can learn from physics. There are roles, and its applicable what a Human do. Everyone, cant do everything ... but this Z generation is hilarious.
So if someone's role, being at 2000 + at Chess, do it, until he can't do it, and we find something else, to make social diversity, to have different people at different status and role.
Peoples are so retarded these days, they dont wanna even work for directly for their food, whats the base of everything. But not even indirectly.
IQ = Money? True, until not the money drives peoples to do the jobs.
Money = Natural selection? Or more like IQ, and intelligence is the product of entropy?
100%, Food is not random. Healthy food = more money. Pandemic and Queens gambit netflix series = Computer addiction with new decentralized hierarchy.
Why the hell peoples even watch TV shows? Peoples needs validation, socially, if theyr wanna show up their creativity, and intelligence, and beauty. Is that good? Why they do it? Because our lives will be useless if we didnt show / make anything to others ...
Wanna get into history? Do it if you can. Does they drive peoples, to have hope and goals in life? Yes. Is that good? Yes. Why? Because peoples need interaction to represent their social hierarchy, so this way, they do those things, instead the bad ones, what cause problems in world. Thats it.
If we are trolling on forums, that's good. Everything is under time at the end, thats not reversible, they call it termodynamics.
Bro can you write a bit less I don't have the attention span for this
Apr 7, 2025
0
#1284
futureeguy wrote:
(This message is for Honchkrowabcd.)
I would usually respectfully agree or disagree with this one, but this is just rude. We are not braindead, we just haven't been taught to play correctly. This edit you just said: "Edit: I just realized that even though this change would make the forums a better place for everyone, the under 500s would still complain and they might stop buying memberships, which is why I think they should be shadowbanned instead so Chess.com doesn't lose any money." is also impolite.
You are talking trash about us more than you're explaining why we should be shadowbanned and banned from forums. If you hadn't said those things, I would've actually agreed with you. Because as a person under 500 elo, I suck and shouldn't be on the forums for a long time because I'm not experienced.
Yes, there are a lot of immature children making false accusations of bots or barely contributing on the forums. But we do not like people making fun of our faces and/or offending us. This is harassment to all under-500 Elo players. We may do other things and/or not understand the game or our coaches very well.
Another reason I would say no against your petition is because we have no games on our profile for a reason. We are all human beings and might be doing other things, we might be in different time zones and you can't see it.
The point is I would typically agree but with harassment and behavior like that is offensive and rude towards all people, immature, trolls, or mature under-500 Elo. This is harassment towards us. Please put positive or neutral messages next time, dude.
I'm sorry if my post came off as rude to under 500 rated players, but every single one of them has been terrorizing and trolling the chess.com forums for way too long and there is no other explanation I can give to describe them so if you don't like it I'm sorry but it's true. And trying to justify being under 500 rating is just insane, I understand that some people don't pick up chess as fast as others but every single game under 500 rating points is just random moves being played until someone accidentally hits a checkmate, these people cannot be serious players or people trying to learn chess. And if someone wanted to contribute chess, they will have played chess games before. If they don't play chess, don't be on a chess forum
Apr 7, 2025
0
#1285
AlolanVulpixPlaysChess wrote:
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
Ill crush a 500 blindfolded. They hang pieces every other move
then play blindfolded on your stupid "desktop" idea. We would love to see that.
1st of all, I don't want to grind rapid to be able to talk to people on otf
2nd of all, chess.com has a different problem. If you have a bad freakin' day, you can lose like 100 elo from straight losses. I feel like they should make it so that less elo is taken with each consecutive loss. This 'pity' system would make it so that you cannot lose all of your progress from one bad day.
I would love to hear about anyone's opinions or counterarguments on this.
1. You don't like playing chess, so then don't talk on a chess forum.
2. If you are losing a bunch of games in a row, it means your rating is much higher than it should be and once your rating more accurately represents your rating, you won't be losing 100 elo.
> 2. If you are losing a bunch of games in a row, it means your rating is much higher than it should be and once your rating more accurately represents your rating, you won't be losing 100 elo.
Depends on mood, at least in my case
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1289
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
wrote:
i could crush a 200 blindfolded
I WONDER WHY
I wonder how
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1292
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
futureeguy wrote:
(This message is for Honchkrowabcd.)
I would usually respectfully agree or disagree with this one, but this is just rude. We are not braindead, we just haven't been taught to play correctly. This edit you just said: "Edit: I just realized that even though this change would make the forums a better place for everyone, the under 500s would still complain and they might stop buying memberships, which is why I think they should be shadowbanned instead so Chess.com doesn't lose any money." is also impolite.
You are talking trash about us more than you're explaining why we should be shadowbanned and banned from forums. If you hadn't said those things, I would've actually agreed with you. Because as a person under 500 elo, I suck and shouldn't be on the forums for a long time because I'm not experienced.
Yes, there are a lot of immature children making false accusations of bots or barely contributing on the forums. But we do not like people making fun of our faces and/or offending us. This is harassment to all under-500 Elo players. We may do other things and/or not understand the game or our coaches very well.
Another reason I would say no against your petition is because we have no games on our profile for a reason. We are all human beings and might be doing other things, we might be in different time zones and you can't see it.
The point is I would typically agree but with harassment and behavior like that is offensive and rude towards all people, immature, trolls, or mature under-500 Elo. This is harassment towards us. Please put positive or neutral messages next time, dude.
I'm sorry if my post came off as rude to under 500 rated players, but every single one of them has been terrorizing and trolling the chess.com forums for way too long and there is no other explanation I can give to describe them so if you don't like it I'm sorry but it's true. And trying to justify being under 500 rating is just insane, I understand that some people don't pick up chess as fast as others but every single game under 500 rating points is just random moves being played until someone accidentally hits a checkmate, these people cannot be serious players or people trying to learn chess. And if someone wanted to contribute chess, they will have played chess games before. If they don't play chess, don't be on a chess forum
"every single one" - No, not every single U500 is a troll. There are more troll alt accounts that reach 1000 then start trolling then there are "troll U500s." I'm sure you've seen your fair share of troll alts, and they are more numerous than the U500s, most of which don't even touch the forums. Removing a privilege just because a minority is morally and ethically wrong. Same way you would get pissed off if one kid messed up on a test and now you have double the homework.
"justify being U500" - most U500s are there for one of 3 reasons: 1). they're new, 2). they don't play a ton, 3). they're smurfs. 4 would be that they just aren't that good, and some people legitametly aren't that good at chess. That doesn't make them lesser in any way, shape, or form. They would actually benefit from looking through forums and asking questions in higher-level forums. Maybe they are "serious players" but actually have a life that impedes them from learning. Most people don't have the privilege of having a learning environment for more than 2 days a week. Improvement comes slowly to those people.
- "if they don't play chess" I mean this is chess.com, but there are other uses for this site asides from chess. You can watch statistics on championships, read blogs, do some lessons, spectate games, so on and so forth. This is a social site as well as a chess site. Of course, not to the degree of tiktok or twitter. Most people on the forums have at least played 10-20 games before finding the forums unless they were directed over here for some purpose or they are an alt account.
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1293
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
yo bro you and me have the same amt of views
no way! wow
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1294
Thisguyisgreat4 wrote:
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
yo bro you and me have the same amt of views
no way! wow
wait no we dont, you have way more than me
In all seriousness, I absolutely agree with the shadowban and also the generic ban, makes perfect sense to me. Btw I am likely to be a troll but i am way above 500 so i guess i am one of a kind
Apr 8, 2025
0
#1296
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
In all seriousness, I absolutely agree with the shadowban and also the generic ban, makes perfect sense to me. Btw I am likely to be a troll but i am way above 500 so i guess i am one of a kind
cmon man look at the community backlash. this is a bad idea
Apr 9, 2025
0
#1297
StandStarter wrote:
Idrinkyourhealth3 wrote:
In all seriousness, I absolutely agree with the shadowban and also the generic ban, makes perfect sense to me. Btw I am likely to be a troll but i am way above 500 so i guess i am one of a kind
cmon man look at the community backlash. this is a bad idea
Real
Apr 9, 2025
0
#1298
wrote:
Thisguyisgreat4 wrote:
ChessAGC_YT wrote:
yo bro you and me have the same amt of views
no way! wow
wait no we dont, you have way more than me
lmao
Hmm, this thread is still active...
Well, have a great Thursday, people 
As a coach, I completely disagree. Misinformed opinion.