Petition to include higher rated players in the titled tuesday event as well

Sort:
rishabh11great
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:

hey everyone, so i have this idea regarding the titled tuesday event.Many titled players playing in the event are actually quite low rated, so my idea was to conduct a swiss tmt for 2000+ rated players and top 10 gets to play in titled tuesday. do lemme know ur thoughts on this, thx.

Its should be 2300+ as most titled players are in that range, but the thing is that then, "TITLED TUESDAY" would no longer make sense. It would be something like Elite Tuesday, players above 2300 are definitely ELITE IN BLITZ but Titled is different than elite.

rishabh11great
ananthramdas wrote:

But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open

Noooooooooooooooooooooo, not at all , I completely disagree.

rishabh11great
ananthramdas wrote:
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:
ananthramdas wrote:

But instead of rating 2000 restricted we could make it open

if u make it open everyone will come and server might crash, thats why it should be 2000+

Then make it 1600+ Most 1200-1500 Fide players are below 2000 

1200-1500 is no where closed to titled, also the average difference between FIDE rating and cc blitz is 300-400 minimum. And most titled players are 2000 FIDE , so 2300 is best, The ONLY PROBLEM is this can't be done as titled tuesday is only for titled players. 

And what you are saying 1600+? HAHAHAHAHAHA, man... If we started keeping 1600+ in titled tuesday then why the heck is the tournament being held? 1600 CC is other thing even 1600 FIDE is not elite, ok there are many who are OP in blitz and above 2300 here, for them as I said a seperate tmt along with tilted players can probably be done.

rishabh11great

Yes but we can keep a event for ALL ELITE PLAYER SEPERATELY (2300 above and titled) but the thing is it would be burden on staff, I am not sure if it can be done but definitely a thing to think about !

DrChessWizard

I meant 1600+ FIDE rated players

rishabh11great

Still...

rishabh11great

Many are there who have less FIDE as its 6 months or more since the time the pandemic started... so CC rating should be a take also, the MAIN THING is that the player should have played many rated games and also his rating should not be provisional.

DrChessWizard
rishabh11great wrote:

Many are there who have less FIDE as its 6 months or more since the time the pandemic started... so CC rating should be a take also, the MAIN THING is that the player should have played many rated games and also his rating should not be provisional.

Then Lets take the average of your rating in Fide and CC rating. If it is above 1600 U can play If not u cannot Play

vishnu_vijay_93
ananthramdas wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:

Many are there who have less FIDE as its 6 months or more since the time the pandemic started... so CC rating should be a take also, the MAIN THING is that the player should have played many rated games and also his rating should not be provisional.

Then Lets take the average of your rating in Fide and CC rating. If it is above 1600 U can play If not u cannot Play

that wont work.some ppl are heavily underrated and vice versa as well

DrChessWizard
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:
ananthramdas wrote:
rishabh11great wrote:

Many are there who have less FIDE as its 6 months or more since the time the pandemic started... so CC rating should be a take also, the MAIN THING is that the player should have played many rated games and also his rating should not be provisional.

Then Lets take the average of your rating in Fide and CC rating. If it is above 1600 U can play If not u cannot Play

that wont work.some ppl are heavily underrated and vice versa as well

Oh yea

rishabh11great

Yes, CC blitz rating should be the parameter on which it should be decided.

llama
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:

hey everyone, so i have this idea regarding the titled tuesday event.Many titled players playing in the event are actually quite low rated, so my idea was to conduct a swiss tmt for 2000+ rated players and top 10 gets to play in titled tuesday. do lemme know ur thoughts on this, thx.

Top 10?

No way.

The top 1... maybe top 2 of untitled Tuesday.

That's about it.

Because sure, some titled players are garbage and don't deserve to play in titled Tuesday... so it makes sense to include some very strong untitled players... maybe not 2300 like yourself, but yeah, players like this kid @rychessmaster1 would make sense.

vishnu_vijay_93
llama wrote:
vishnu_vijay_93 wrote:

hey everyone, so i have this idea regarding the titled tuesday event.Many titled players playing in the event are actually quite low rated, so my idea was to conduct a swiss tmt for 2000+ rated players and top 10 gets to play in titled tuesday. do lemme know ur thoughts on this, thx.

Top 10?

No way.

The top 1... maybe top 2 of untitled Tuesday.

That's about it.

Because sure, some titled players are garbage and don't deserve to play in titled Tuesday... so it makes sense to include some very strong untitled players... maybe not 2300 like yourself, but yeah, players like this kid @rychessmaster1 would make sense.

he is actually a Candidate master but he has not verified it with CC i feel

llama

I know him in real life. He's not a CM.

Players in the United States can't easily get FIDE titles like CM. It doesn't matter if they're very good.

vishnu_vijay_93

oh ok, but why is it mentioned in @NobleElevator's profile that he defeated CM rychessmaster?

llama

Probably because he's a kid and doesn't know what CM means.

He thinks a high online rating is comparable to a FIDE titile.

vishnu_vijay_93

he is 15...but ok, this is steering away from the topic..

llama

15 is a kid...

Lightning

He is a uscf CM, you can check his uscf stats lol

llama

"USCF CM"

lol

Unfollowing.