I know both notations. It is hard when i play Vote Chess when i type a move in depending on which one i have read recently is the one i will post or accidently combine them. People get confused which move i am talking about for 2 seconds.
Worse is i have made my own variation up when i am taking notes on my games. I had to stop as i have books on both notations and sometimes i read both at same time.
But something to be said about the old notation as when the moves are written i know right away which are of the board the attacks are taking place. It forces me to divide the board up into areas.
Browsed the net the other day, thinking it would be cool if a translator existed from algebraic notation to descriptive. I noticed some discussion on Chess.com, someone saying they prefer this and find it easier to read. A site called "swiss immaculate" has the translator in question available for download. It's only keyboard input (written in Pascal), but it does a great job. It would also do a terrific job of allowing users to compare the two, if they are interested in learning. Let's face it, a great many very good books on chess are in descriptive notation, and there may be eBook versions available, if not now, then soon. In my opinion, Reuben Fine's "Basic Chess Endings" should be the Chess Bible, but I can't see it being outdone soon. And a translation into algebraic? That will happen when a computer can do the job from a scan. I hope this will interest others besides myself.