I've given up on the tournaments except for Chess.com tournaments. There are too many, they are poorly organized and generally a waste of time. Too many people time out, too many drag them on forever and there is no way to sort the grain from the chaff and thus, as I said at the first, I only go to the Chess.com tournaments and have given up on starting any new ones. So the answer to the question in your post is: NA. I'm not going to look at the tournament in the first place.
Full Disclosure: Minimum Games Completed and Maximum Timeout %
Sort:
There is an excess supply of tournaments.
Some you can tell right away that you are not interested.
This will be in registration until the end of the internet. http://www.chess.com/tournament/the-shortest-tournament-ever-2-be-on-chesscom
This 8 to 16 year tournament filled the need for some players, maybe not you. http://www.chess.com/tournament/humongues-tournament
This 4 to 8 year tournament may have been more palatable. http://www.chess.com/tournament/slow-but-fast
To fill tournaments more quickly some tournament directors allow any player to join their tournaments.
If you were aware of the Minimum Games Completed was adjusted from the default five to zero or that the Maximum Timeout % was adjusted from 10 to 100 would you bypass the tournament?
Any responses will be updated in this first post.
Yes - 0
No - 0
N/A - 1 (I'm too disgruntled for my shirt, too disgruntled.)
Advertising: Minimum Games Completed: 100 and Maximum Timeout %: 10 (Rating Range: 701-1075 up to 1100+ later)