How to get to EXPERT LEVEL?

Sort:
ayesdeeef

Hi KnightDwarf!

I know I'm not as good as you are, but I would say to train in tactics a lot, because that is how you win games. Also, you want to play against extremely high-rated opponents. You can learn a lot from them, and if you win, that's amazing. Just try not to lose. Also, play to win. "A drawn game is a wasted game" (Something along the lines of what Hikaru Nakamura once said). Focus on positional play also. The games that aren't decided by tactics are decided by postition. Look at Emanuel Lasker's tips for perfect positional play, and follow them as well as you can. Also, study some of his games if you really want to. Finally, even though it is important not to only play one or two opponents, there should be one or two friends with whom you often compare, discuss, and play with in order to make both yourself and your friends better. That's my a lot more than two cents, and I hope it helps!

ayesdeeef

chessmaster102
MrKornKid wrote:
paulgottlieb wrote:

I think you have to be very objective about examining your own games, particularly your serious OTB games. Win or lose, your games provide your primary learning material. And I'm not talking about going through them with an engine and just observing. You need to take your games apart. How did the opening go? Did you understand it? Where did you leave book, and who deviated first? Check the books afterwards evaluate your play. In the middlegame, did you have a plan? Was the pawn structure one thast you recognized? Did you understand what your opponent's plan was? What about tactics? Did you miss any tactical shots--either yours or your opponent's? If there was an endgame, how did you do? Did you have a plan? Was the ending one that you understood? If not, do some studying and learn the basics of that particular endgame.

It you can get some coaching, all the better, but you can do a tremendous amount of good work on your own. And your own games will provide you with a lot of material.


I'm not done reading this thread yet but as soon as I read this I felt the need to post.  What a remarkable response Paul.  I am jotting down those particular questions to even help myself as a beginner.

I also copied these questions. Great response.

AndyClifton

I would like to get to EXPORT LEVEL.

alec86
KnightDwarf wrote:

 I want to know what it takes to get to the next level, to get to 1900-2000 expert level.

In the movie the million dollar baby there's a big sign in Clint's gym that says "winners are simply willing to do what losers won't".

Step it up raise your game work hard and study books take lessons from a GM or IM and pay your dues with constant practice against tougher and better players than you at a chess club or online to get experience.

AndyClifton
alec86 wrote:
In the movie the million dollar baby there's a big sign in Clint's gym that says "winners are simply willing to do what losers won't".

 

lol

Zinsch
Abhishek2 wrote:

depends on your style. My style is more win/lose so in the past ~50 OTB games I've played I've drawn 5, won 27, and lost 19

10% draws in long OTB games is extremely low for someone, who is past the beginner phase.

Abhishek2

well that's how I am then.

HCentral

Studying endgames is a good way to improve. Many players even at your level aren't great in the endgame and will often offer a draw rather than play it out. If you have done plenty of study you should find a plan to win or at least make your opponent uncomfortable enough to make a mistake.

VLaurenT
KnightDwarf wrote:

Hi all, I play in many OTB tournaments. I would say that I play on average every other weekend. My current USCF rating is about 1850 and I have been stuck around there for quite a while. Several times I have been close to getting to 1900, but some really stupid mistakes have been setting me back. I want to know what it takes to get to the next level, to get to 1900-2000 expert level. I don't read many books but I follow big GM tournaments and watch videos on ICC and elsewhere. How do I break out of this plateu and improve to the next level?

All feedback is greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

KnightDwarf

At your level you should try some coaching with a FM or stronger player. They would probably be able to tell you what you need to get those extra 150 pts.

HotBoxRes

Play, play, play. Then play some more.

The more you play, the more key positions and tactics you will be exposed to.

Those "stupid mistakes" will disappear with enough repetitions, and you'll break the 2000 barrier with ease.

EddieB1963

When I used to play competitively for maybe a year, I was a C player.  Probably could have gotten a good bit better, but not expert level.  As I am new to this site, I was wondering if there was a way to get a few games going with, say, D or unrated players, that do not have a fast play format?  Just wanting to fool around with this a bit until I get in the groove . . .

TetsuoShima
AlCzervik wrote:

I got to 1500 by reading every bishop vs. knight thread.

lol

TetsuoShima
AndyClifton wrote:

I would like to get to EXPORT LEVEL.

yeah me too...

TetsuoShima
Abhishek2 wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
Shadowknight911 wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
Abhishek2 wrote:

you have to beat 2000's to get to 2000.

like you know.


Abhishek's rating in real life is a bit over 2000 and he beat a couple of 2100's this weekend, so yes, I guess he would know.

it is true that the best way to gain rating points in bigger bunches is by playing players one class above you.

yeah like you know!

lol his rating is higher than mine try getting up to 2000 you hypocrite 

like YOU KNOW what it takes!

thats true what he is saying,  i heard Myer Lansky always played with the older kids.

mldavis617
EddieB1963 wrote:

I was wondering if there was a way to get a few games going with, say, D or unrated players, that do not have a fast play format?  Just wanting to fool around with this a bit until I get in the groove . . .

Go to the Online games and choose your time limit unless you really want to play live.  I play about 4-5 Online games at once with typically a 3-day turnaround which gives me some flexibility if I have to be away for a weekend or on the road.  You can select the rating range, but I just let the chess.com site do it for me.  As you gain rating points, the window will shift accordingly up or down.

Zinsch
HotBoxRes wrote:

Play, play, play. Then play some more.

The more you play, the more key positions and tactics you will be exposed to.

Those "stupid mistakes" will disappear with enough repetitions, and you'll break the 2000 barrier with ease.

Although this is true to some extent, there will be a barrier that you can't break with playing only. You need to study hard then to increase that ceiling.

HotBoxRes
Zinsch wrote:
HotBoxRes wrote:

Play, play, play. Then play some more.

The more you play, the more key positions and tactics you will be exposed to.

Those "stupid mistakes" will disappear with enough repetitions, and you'll break the 2000 barrier with ease.

Although this is true to some extent, there will be a barrier that you can't break with playing only. You need to study hard then to increase that ceiling.

You're probably right.

Although, I don't think study is required to reach expert level.

Master level, perhaps, but not expert.

redchessman
HotBoxRes wrote:
Zinsch wrote:
HotBoxRes wrote:

Play, play, play. Then play some more.

The more you play, the more key positions and tactics you will be exposed to.

Those "stupid mistakes" will disappear with enough repetitions, and you'll break the 2000 barrier with ease.

Although this is true to some extent, there will be a barrier that you can't break with playing only. You need to study hard then to increase that ceiling.

You're probably right.

Although, I don't think study is required to reach expert level.

Master level, perhaps, but not expert.

That's completely wrong.  I did a significant amount of work to become an expert.

HotBoxRes

You may have, but I haven't.

With the exception of skimming through Nimzo's "My System", the only work I've done is play blitz and lightning.

Abhishek2
redchessman wrote:
HotBoxRes wrote:
Zinsch wrote:
HotBoxRes wrote:

Play, play, play. Then play some more.

The more you play, the more key positions and tactics you will be exposed to.

Those "stupid mistakes" will disappear with enough repetitions, and you'll break the 2000 barrier with ease.

Although this is true to some extent, there will be a barrier that you can't break with playing only. You need to study hard then to increase that ceiling.

You're probably right.

Although, I don't think study is required to reach expert level.

Master level, perhaps, but not expert.

That's completely wrong.  I did a significant amount of work to become an expert.

me too.