Nice finish!
My best Tactical Game

It's an interesting game, but I believe it's disrespectful not to name your opponent with his real name. And what should he complain about?

It's an interesting game, but I believe it's disrespectful not to name your opponent with his real name. And what should he complain about?
its against the rules, usually. It would be considered 'naming and shaming'

But in such a case it would mean that you consider your opponent's play to have been of poor quality or something like that, otherwise you needn't assume he should be ashamed. Game annotation in chess literature, sites, etc. doesn't omit players' names unless they are not known, and I think no player has complained about that. Moreover, chess.com's game posting tool does show the players' names by default when pasting pgn, and that's how most of the games are presented - if the moderators consider it inappropriate one of the players to be known there should be implemented some ways for that to happen (a checkbox for showing the name for example) or at least that should be clearly stated in the forum rules. But I don't think there's anything incorrect with showing the name of your opponent, I think it's a matter of respect actually.
This game has been taken from one of my most epic tournaments in which I came first in U-14 category(My orignal category being U-11)ahead of 8 other fide rated players with a score of 5.5/6.
My this game was against a 1682(Haven't mentioned his name incase he complains
).I t was in a rapid tournamnet and at the end both of us had only 20 seconds left on our clock with a huge crowd gathering around us!!(Time control was-30 mins+5sec increment).
Please post your improvements.[Ratings mentioned are fide ratings].