ratings and Swiss system pairings

Sort:
Maroon_25

[This is not a question about tournaments here on chess.com -- just a general one about Swiss system tournaments.]  I know the basics of the Swiss pairing system, but I also have a question:  does the Swiss system show any bias in favor of higher-rated or lower-rated players?  In other words, would two players of different ratings but the same strength have different chances of winning the event, given their different pairings?

DrawMaster

The pairing system presumes, at least in some sense, that the ratings of players are THE indicator of their playing strength. So, think about it: if you were playing in a tournment with players rated 1000 to 2000 - and your strength was 2000 - you would get to play weaker players (by rating) if your posted rating were only 1200 versus the 2000 playing strength. However, even if you won all the games your were expected to win by your playing strength, your tie-breaks would be worse for winning the overall prize, I believe, having played on average a weaker field.

The place where this advantage come in is for class prizes. Here, having a rating that is very non-reflective of your strength - in the correct direction - is a very strong advantage for winning the class prize. Organizations like the USCF try to prevent this from being a significant factor in two ways: a) providing ratings floors below which a player's rating cannot fall after achieving some higher rating, and b) limiting the prize-winning possibilities for unrated (and to some extent lower rated) players.

ozzie_c_cobblepot

To answer the question from post #1, I think that two players of equal playing strength with different ratings would have different chances of winning the event.

Without knowing more, you can't really say which player is favored.

But you can make some general statements, like it's better to be top rated in a section compared with being rated 3/4 down from the top.

Another variable is what the actual strength is of the two players. For example, if it is a B section (1600-1800) and 2 players each of 1850 strength are in the tournament, with all other players in the tournament rated fairly, then it is better to have a rating of 1799 than to have a rating of 1650. Also, interestingly, in this case, it is nearly equivalent to have a rating of 1799 and a rating of 1601, since you will always be paired with the middle.