Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Value Of The Two Minor Pieces vs. Rook+Pawn

I'm sure that all of us have heard at one time or another that after

You should never play Ng5 and then play Nxf7, trading your 2 Minor Pieces for a Rook and Pawn. Although this is true, just hearing this is (hopefully) not enough to convince you that it is true. To fully understand chess, it's necessary to have more then just vague, cryptic explanations from stronger players. For example, if a 2400+ says something that you play is bad, but offers no explanation, then although he/she is most likely right, this information is not helpful, but only serves to confuse. The point is, whoever is giving the information needs to either make their point clear and concise (to the audience, not themselves) or not mention it at all because if it doesn't make sense, although the advice may help you in the short term, it can't replace true understanding. On to the title topic.

Here it is.
And now I will finally bring this instructive blog post to a conclusion by saying I hope 1.You have enjoyed my one of many instructive blog posts. 2.That you have learned something from this post. 3.That if you have enjoyed my post and/or found it instructive you will pass it on to your friends. 4. That you will let me know what you thought about my blog post, and give me any feedback/suggestions you might have.Also if you liked it you can 
track my blog so you will know when I post and, (now that I am finally a registered coach here at Chess.com) View My  Coaching Services .
Thanks for reading this,
                                             Miles

Comments


  • 16 months ago

    JagdeepSingh

    Well, in a general point of view, getting 2 Minor pieces for a Rook & pawn is certainly better.  That's what I was taught plus never give a damn about the points of the pieces.

    Nice post. :)

  • 17 months ago

    Kunto_Pram

    its great !

  • 17 months ago

    DRAGON

    WHITE DONT HAVE A CHANCE!!!

  • 17 months ago

    pianoman4

    I'm glad you all liked it.

  • 17 months ago

    kadoctoreipRgeg__

    That move 19. Qh4 was wild 

    Very good article...


       

  • 17 months ago

    vslakshmi

             Well . Good game .

  • 18 months ago

    Loufoque

    thanks, your explain are good.

  • 18 months ago

    IndestructibleKing

    great one

  • 18 months ago

    TOLOEI

    its very good. I enjoed that

  • 18 months ago

    superdrewe

    i like the analysis, but the trouble is when playing lower rated players, they never play the way you want them to, and the book moves go to the wall

  • 18 months ago

    _36darshan--

    good

  • 18 months ago

    mathew141

    yea,i really like the way you  explained.

  • 18 months ago

    ksbalan04

    Good game. Thanks for the post. Regards.

  • 18 months ago

    SharmaPawan

    good one

  • 18 months ago

    Akilamar

    Sorry to say this maybe you will gett me wrong, but don't send this poor chess.. P.S. Com and give me a bishop and a knight i give you my queen and you will see how will end up, and analyze it with others then..qao take care

  • 18 months ago

    Macdermott

    Thanks Pianoman, enjoyed it.

  • 18 months ago

    Loufoque

    Thanks,i like it.

  • 18 months ago

    talhah

    gr8 article with a nice example. Keep em coming... Wink

  • 18 months ago

    Binamoneshan

    thanks a lot

  • 18 months ago

    Conflagration_Planet

    Good thread.

Back to Top

Post your reply: