9901 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Some players find a comfort zone in playing ...c6 and ...d5 systematically (Bologan and Shankland have been mentioned). However, the Caro-Kann and Slav are not related systems. That is, unless you can sneak this transposition:
There's more to any opening than merely the placement of one's own pawns, and a pairing that may make sense to one player may well be somewhat off-putting to another.
Take the King's Indian defense.
To somebody who likes games that feature interlocking pawn chains in the center of the board, and the strategies that revolve around those, the French defense makes sense as a counterpart, as has already been mentioned.
To somebody who likes games that feature a dark-square defense, and the similarity of the targets in the opponent's camp that different dark square defenses tend to have in common, the Accelerated Dragon may make more sense than the light-square French, because tactics and piece placements aren't going to be as thematically connected in the French. A recent thread highlighted GM Malakhov's preference for this pairing. I think Perelshteyn plays like this too.
To somebody who likes the tendency of the KID to evolve into a direct counterattack on the opponent's king, certain Sicilians such as Najdorfs or d6 Dragons may make sense as a counterpart. Kasparov springs to mind.
To a Petrosian who liked playing with the solid kingside structure and defensive resources of the KID, it made sense to pair it with the Caro-Kann frequently. Though Petrosian's repertoire was very diverse, of course, those two defenses featured prominently during his WC tenure.
To a player who likes the idea that extremely similar positions can arise from extremely different openings, and the secondary idea that deep knowledge of those positions can give you a better shot at high-level understanding of the differences and similarities (and thus perhaps a small edge over your opponent), the Breyer Lopez may be a good pairing. See: Radjabov.
The point is, it's very reasonable to find similarities that you want to highlight in two different defenses, and the fact that Soltis chose to do so with the Caro and Slav doesn't make him "right" or "wrong," just outspoken in his opinion. There are plenty of similarities between these two defenses. They aren't universal, but you might choose to agree. Or you may dissent. It's a lovely game that way.
who is better :: Carlsen or Kasparov or Karpov ???
by rajarshibasu a few minutes ago
by ramrao2000 a few minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by TheResurrectionofTal 5 minutes ago
What do you do when your king leaves?
by MissBeehavin 5 minutes ago
Your contact form is not working!
by Arrakis09 13 minutes ago
Carlsen vs Anand rematch
by tigerprowl 14 minutes ago
Why are you all so mean?
by Darth_Doom 21 minutes ago
not able to log in to live chess.. Site shows loading.. and nothing happens
by pcw1 26 minutes ago
what can i do to dissapear all my forum topics?
by RonaldJosephCote 28 minutes ago
3/16/2014 - Drawing Technique
by biat 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!