9795 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Eric, is there any way to hide "friends list" from everyone, not just non-friends? It used to be hidden from everyone unless you wanted others to see it. Why not have all your privacy info set as a default so no one can see anything unless you select who is privy to it, instead of this way?
Allegretto, see Erik's post #663.
They have now given the option to hide our friend's list from non-friends.
But there is still no option to hide the list from everyone, as you can do in Facebook and all social networks, if you want to.
I would imagine unchecking the checkbox Friends can view my friends. would do that.
Oddly placed under invites though.
Agreed. That's odd. Looking into it now.
Thanks. Very deceptive. All it needed were 3 options in the one spot,
'Anyone' can view my friends
'Only my friends' can view my friends
'No-one' can view my friends (or 'Myself only' can view my friends)
Unchecking 'Friends can view my friends' does not hide it from everyone. I just did a test and others can still view it.. I have that box unchecked.
My friends can still view my friends list.
I can't get to my home page on the iPad
Also I've noticed, the option to stop anyone sending you friend requests has been removed.. that new link to uncheck friends viewing friends list (which doesn't work) has replaced it's spot.
Not that it bothers me as I don't care who sends me a request, I either accept or ignore or decline if a real sleazebag, but I know others like to block requests coming through.. guessing this is an error and not a deliberate feature removal.
Yup. That's what we're going to do! :)
Are there any plans to add to, or change the emoticons?
Here's a novel idea.. how about testing links and new or adjusted features/options provided rather than putting them up and waiting for us all to say they don't work or there's a new problem caused?
If you can't test it properly without putting it up, then at least can't it be tested as soon as it goes up?
Happy to see that Michael, just not sure why it wasn't done in the very first place, and now the 2nd place.. but hopefully 3rd time lucky.
Maybe it´s cheaper this way ?
we're running as fast as we can to fix the bugs and make everything right. here's a novel idea - put yourself in our shoes and think what's it like trying to run a site of 5 million demanding members. if we make a mistake every once in a while, trying giving us a break.
that particular code was written by a new developer. i'm not sure who QA'd it, but obviously they didn't QA it well. but seriously - can you please get off my back already? :) i know you aren't happy. i know you have a billion criticisms of how i do things. i've heard it already. enough, please.
we're more than happy to fix things, build things, and do our best to make everyone happy. but it helps when it's done with support, not with "told you so" and "you suck" and "here's a novel idea". treating us like idiots doesn't help. and we're not idiots - we built the best chess site in the world, and the ~2,000th most visited site in the world. :D so, please kebabs... enough already.
Um, there was a beta version of the new design available for about a month. As far as I know, everyone was given a message upon logging in alerting us to the new version and to a link to look to it. With one click, you could use the new design and give feedback then.
um.. yes I know that, I did check it out, was hard not to miss that news as it was well advertised. But there were bugs reported there that weren't all fixed before the new site went up. And new bugs reported after the site went up.. said it before several times, wish they were all well tested in the beta stage before going live.
I've given you credit a million times Erik. I always give credit when due, and you deserved credit many times. You can't deny you've heard me praise you also in the forums. One praise was that you are doing your best to fix the bugs..
Just that last fix with the friend's list was so weird, and I didn't blame you personally for it. And it does seem like it wasn't tested/checked by 'whoever' did it and I'm sure you yourself would expect that, yes? Standard to ask your developers to test their work?
And I'm not the only one who has expressed many times their unhappiness with the new site, many others did as well. And I'm just one voice here out of 5 million, I know that.
Also am not 100% unhappy with the new site, did say what I did like. The chess.com homepage looks much better, because has some decent contrast in there.
I've also asked people to be patient when they wanted to close their account or not renew their memberships because of their unhappiness. I would have stopped one diamond member who closed his account but he did it while I was sleeping so had no chance to. That was silly.
I'd be more worried about those members than me.
I said it in the past and recently and will say it again, chess.com is the best chess site around.. and have faith the bugs/issues will all be sorted eventually.
No more TinyMCE for the iPad? Seems to have disappeared just today.
I just wish they were fixed/sorted in beta stage, not after it went live.. for the sake of the members who are experiencing so many problems, especially on phones, and also for the sake of staff, not to have had this backlash.
Was it a big problem to keep the 2 optional sites up to keep working on the bugs before the big switch? Sorry for asking again, I may have missed the reason/answer for ditching the beta testing site so soon. So far I haven't seen one that explains 'well' why that happened.
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by ponz111 a few minutes ago
How do you feel about players who win by cowardly queening a pawn
by aman_makhija a few minutes ago
by gokuandritesh7809 3 minutes ago
Poker Chess Magic The Gathering Baccarat
by Tapani 6 minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by MSC157 8 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by aman_makhija 10 minutes ago
Time Control Changes?
by peacefulblue 12 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by MSC157 14 minutes ago
by dashkee94 26 minutes ago
What to do when your opponent makes a move (for U1200)
by TardisBenko 40 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!