13815 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
3018. What's chess?
@December_TwentyNine: 3017 is not a sign that has anything to do with having enough knowledge of chess imo. There is, however, a correlation between the capacity of playing chess and the level of rudeness in threads. But it is not vice versa: not being rude means being able to play good chess. Nor does it imply that one has enough knowledge of chess.
I am in general not rude in my comments, but that does not imply that I have enough knowledge of chess. I will prove the latter with a position from a game I played recently.
Look at this position:
3019: Being white are you going to lose a rook in this position.
(Yes, I did).
Later in the game, there was this position:
So white would play Rg4 and next Qe4 forcing the trade of queens, leaving a won endgame, doesn't it? No, I played Qd3???, giving black the opportunity to play Qxe5+ and having a perpetual check escape, creating rule
3020: you let a pawn or piece undefended that can be captured by your opponent with check.
However, I still managed to win the game, because my opponent was so friendly to overlook a mate in one, creating rule
3021: you are overlooking a mate in one.
I stand corrected! Yes, that comment I made had nothing to do with the ability to know what you're doing in a chess game. And I agree with you. I look at your game above and, thinking about it, Qd3 looked rather painful. And trust me I know that feeling. I've made many mistakes and lost many "won" games. In that diagram, I was looking at White playing Rook to Queen 3, followed up with Queen to Bishop 3, which puts Black in check forcing the Queens of the board, making the end game a little easier.
3022: You're a patzer like me who makes the above statement, who thinks she knows what she's talking about
3023: You post a link about 'martian chess' in a thread about people who posted about the theory of chess.
3024: You think that this game has some resemblance with chess:
But I had to admit, that that post gave me a smile, see thread:
3025: You accept a draw on the 83rd move of this game:
3026: You can not decide if the next position is legal or not?
3027: you can not decide in that position who is to move.
3028: you can not decide what is the result of this game.
3028: The result is stalemate or checkmate if white moves. So if you can't decide the result of the game you don't not know enough about chess. To make that statement you previously made and say if you can't decide the result you don't know enough about chess proves you don't know enough about chess because you said if you can't decide the result then you don't know enough about chess and if you can decide the result then you don't not know enough about chess, which is what your statement implies, which is the opposite of how it should be proving you don't know enough about chess as I have already just proved twice.
It is a stalemate. The last move must be a capture of a black piece/pawn by either the white king or a white knight. The black king can't move for some moves already, hence had to be there a black piece/pawn on the board. The last move in this game was therefor a white move. Now is it blacks turn and he can't make a legal move. Hence it is stalemate. The position is legal by the way. The last moves could have been for instance
67... Nh8-g6 68.Nb6-c8 Ng6-e7 69.Nc8xe7 or
99... d4-d3+ 100.Ke2xd3
3029 (in order to keep this thread going to reach 5000)
Upon seeing two people playing chess you ask the question: "What is the difference between checkers and chess?"
(this btw was an actual comment i heard from a 20-something young lady who observed a game a friend and i was playing)
3030 Whadddt? Chess? Didn't you mean cheese? Cheese is surely E zee er.
3031 - The King, Queen, Bishop and Knight is on the board. Where is the Joker?
2001: A Space Odyssey....an Oddity??
by Crazychessplaya a few minutes ago
3/1/2015 - Compelled To Lose
by szammie 3 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by fabskannone 3 minutes ago
by OpiningTheoretician 4 minutes ago
by TwoMove 5 minutes ago
Ruy lopez exchange
by Legendary_Race_Rod 6 minutes ago
Does anyone want to be a Great Chess Player?
by ConnorMacleod_151 8 minutes ago
Tactic Trainer scoring
by mosey69 9 minutes ago
Do you like Chess 960?
by mosey69 11 minutes ago
2/28/2015 - Maister - Grozdov, corr. 1954
by Ray-D-OActive 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!