This is my analysis of your game. Please note that I am only an 1200-1350 player.
I think you showed great inititive in your match and dominated your opponent from start to finish. Good luck in your future chess games.
f4 reply for 1.e4c5
Sort:
I played this in just 3 mins time. I have seen a grand prix game before and I liked it very much. But the problem is that there are so much moves to remember, and slight variation from opposition will get ME into trouble. I dont know why, all recent games I played people are coming with f4. So am forced to try this. d6 is a real suprise if for fast games, because low rated players like us either underestimate the move or is thrown offbalance. THANX for the analysis
I would have liked to have seen 15. ... Rg8 16. Qxh6 gxh6 17. Rxg8#. Other than that, the idea of rushing your kingside pawns is of course nice, although I think you started pushing them too early and your opponent just let things crash into his position. Just a simple 9. ... exf4 would slow down your attack a bit. Even 9. ... Qc7 and 10. ... O-O-O would just make those white kingside pawns look like you could have used all those tempi for development.
2...d5! Tal Gambit -+
oinquarki wrote:
2...d5! Tal Gambit -+
Which is pretty much the reason why the grand prix attack move order is more accurate with 2. Nc3 and 3. f4.
that is dirty what martten you are waste
I really feel proud to win a game in this line of moves. Please comment your suggestion about this win, where he actually went wrong and where i missed a better move.