Game, please help me find my weakest move
Sort:
I am only 1100 ranked in OTB correspondence, thx, in advancet.
I'd probably go with 14...f5.
Mar 20, 2014
0
#6
I don't particularly like 14. ... f5 because of 15. exf6 Nxf6 16. Re1+
I am not sure about 21. ... Bh3 because white can play 22. Kh1. Instead I would probably play 21. ... Rg4 22. Kh1 (or f1) Qxh7 winning a piece cleanly. Though I have not looked at 21. ... Bh3 in a huge amount of detail. But Rg4 wins a piece with no effort.
billforchess wrote:
Move 24 RxQ would have been stronger I would think
I agree Billfo, I think that move my rook to f ws nondescript, in other words, slowing down an imminent mate, I had gotten lucky to afford. I looked at this game again, and I think I won lucky twice, but more on that later. I'd challd.
Lige
pentiumjs wrote:
I'd probably go with 14...f5.
I'd evalld your statement, and it falled, as f5 was a good measure, if not the best but not the very best at the present time, to invade the king's fort with obvious pawn rusch.
Lige
corum wrote:
I don't particularly like 14. ... f5 because of 15. exf6 Nxf6 16. Re1+
I am not sure about 21. ... Bh3 because white can play 22. Kh1. Instead I would probably play 21. ... Rg4 22. Kh1 (or f1) Qxh7 winning a piece cleanly. Though I have not looked at 21. ... Bh3 in a huge amount of detail. But Rg4 wins a piece with no effort.
15..Qxf6 would have been the obvious best move over 15..Nxf6, so I don't take your analysis was well intended or highly logical. I didn't read past that first suggess. I challd.
Lige
achja wrote:d
I quote you saying "dubious" on Qf6, that's ridiculous, for reasons beyond your knowledge. Your extenuated note at move 6. was unmoving in comparison to the reasons for which I made my move, that are following: Well, let's start here, you say "Bf8-c5 looks like a better candidate move here, and c7-c6 as well." My reason that my move 6..dxc3 was better was that I was losing a whole pawn if I did not either back up that pawn with Queen, to a disadvantage getting the queen to d4 which would then be chased around at a loss, and losing a tempe, or I could have backed up d4 pawn with c5, but that was not an aggressive pawn structure limited opportunities for tactical advances or nothing direct I'd be able to identify right now. At move 8.. you state "Black was worse already here. Maybe d7-d6 was best." This is false and I saw no backing for this, it was illogical. At movet 9, you state "Offering to trade the almost only active black piece. Bd6-c7 might have been better." I felt you lied, because the black queen was quite active, and I had a queen and a minor active to my opponents two minors active, a clear advantage in my adv. Then, at move 21.., you'd say "Doing tactics because you see a tactic is not always a good idea. And opening more lines in front of your king for little material gain is only good for top level defenders." I'd move every which way, but I must sayt that I think you are either: 1) unclear as to what you mean, meaning that the words do not indicate accurate what you think they indicate, which is a monumental problem in this say chess analysis for accurate knowing "good" playing, or 2) to a more detriment to your positive talent, saying something that has no principle meaning in what we are trying to define in "good" chess playing. At 21, your suggest for Td8-h8!, which with the exclamation, a little like overfelt clamation, was I think youdt meant Rd8h8, but this was not a primary better move than my advance of Bh3, can we set it? And also getting my B to h3 was primary because it was more offensable, less defensible I think. And you are getting me all antsy with such criticism, I did manage to win, I didn 't make a major foible, and you cite the losing player with quoting "Excellent" at move 9, when you criticized my move 14..f5, with the only possible good move to 15..f4, being 15. f4, which would halt my pawn assault on his weakly defended king-side. Okay? Ha. You are exact right on move 28. move it was best or mere better?! to take the bishop. Another thought, that I would have been up a mere whole minor piece at move blank 21..b or so,, with what take tactic, I think, by the classic define? Ha. At 35.. you state, "! Not afraid of the white e7 pawn,..." and you quote me on the "nice finish" but I am touched, newt, but I am shure you can do better and see that I calculated proper that that pawn near passing was not a mere danger, that I had calcd a mate before he could get the pawn passed... Thanks, Lige
I challd.
Jun 8, 2014
0
#11
@elig5428
Some experts charge money to analyze and annotate your game. Achja did it for free and you didn't even say thanks. You need to learn how to take constructive criticism and use it to improve, not whine because the world isn't perfect. Grow up.
Boogalicious wrote:
@elig5428
Some experts charge money to analyze and annotate your game. Achja did it for free and you didn't even say thanks. You need to learn how to take constructive criticism and use it to improve, not whine because the world isn't perfect. Grow up.
So how did you justify his analysis as worth money? Let's talk I real think you are very off. I was constructively reviewing every comment, with backing in principles of chess. I challenged him openly, if you'd read my constructed comments with intent. Will you submit to this last statement, that you must read my review in order to further justify that I would respect such a useless statement above? No. I am not aware that you understand rational dialectics in argument. Do not insult me unless you try to understand what I had responded to Achja in written form, extact what did I say to construct a statement, well though out and considered, based on principles. Or, do not write me again, if you intend to insult me on other grounds. Aware.
Lige
Lige
Jun 9, 2014
0
#14
ops f5 caaptre ep leaves youre king vurable as well ifQtakes f6 then Qh5follwed by qe5 if night takes simply re1 loosing casling rights if gf6 re1 again follwed by qf3 and you counter attack is over
Jun 9, 2014
0
#15
elig5428 wrote:
achja wrote:d
I quote you saying "dubious" on Qf6, that's ridiculous, for reasons beyond your knowledge. {SNIP}
If you have so much more knowledge than achja, why is your rating more than 800 points below his?
I'll post my own analysis shortly, and I will expect it to be treated as an OPINION of a HIGHER-RATED PLAYER. I didn't reach 1400 by being a jerk to anyone criticizing me, especially when I was the one asking to be criticized. I took the advice of people more knowledgeable than me, and I suggest you do too.
elig5428 wrote:
To start with 5..Qf6 allows 6.e5! as after 6...Qxe5 BWhite has 7.Re1 winning the queen
http://enjoychesslearning.wordpress.com/
Jun 9, 2014
0
#19
tthechesstitan wrote:
elig5428 wrote:
To start with 5..Qf6 allows 6.e5! as after 6...Qxe5 BWhite has 7.Re1 winning the queen
Qxe5 is not forced. 6.e5 is a moderately good move, and is space-gaining if followed with 7.d4, but still allows itself to be challenged by ...d6.
Hey, yall, I'd won the game in black i post next, it was a fun win because of the rating difference, and I spent more time in than usual focusing on my moves in this correspondence game. I posted it for fun viewing, because it was definite fun winning against somewhat 2-300 points better ranked than me. I was gist wondering if someone could point out my weakest move, with greatest error, so I can study it again, was it in the endgame or the opening, as I thought it was in the opening? And you do not have to necessary explain why, just cite it please, okay, or no comment needed, and thanks.... Lige