I assume that you played white? You seemed to get an equal endgame, and then misplay it. Your rook remained passive, and your majority was never activated. Just what I see. didn't see a major blunder, more like an accumulation of smaller errors. (Take all of this with about a pound of salt...) You also might have missedsomething at move 29, instead of Rd3, perhaps Rh8 h6 Rh7 Rc7 with a sharp position?
Game, where did i majorly blunder
White allowed Black to get two passed pawns that are next to each other and in the center. And the fact that Black's king and rook are in a very supporting position. There is no way White can tie this game. Additionally, after White's king moves to row #2, 42. ...Rc2+ wins the a-pawn.
I think the problem was that White sought trades too often, and because of his/her desperation to simplify the endgame, he/she overlooked Black's benefit. Tip for White: Think things through next time: not every trade is good.
Although I'm aware I don't qualify to criticize anybody's games but my own, I'll tell you what I wouldn't have done in your game: the first knights exchange (black recaptures with the other knight, maintaining his position with the simple removal of material from the board (doesn't seem to accomplish anything); White traded an amazing dark square bishop for a passive knight on the seventh rank (with that much space, I'm positive the bishop would be more valuable than the knight); and, finally, I would have tried to maneuver my rook in the endgame to a more active position (as tazerdadog said).
I like White's position by move 15, with the knight on f3 and both DSB and queen eyeing the castled king, I would probably try to launch an attack instead of harrass the enemy queen on the other side of the board. Maybe a good player will provide you with more specific and direct advice.
I played this game at a chess club. Where did I seriously blunder?