11026 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'll be on this evening to post a few games. Things got busy with work!
I was quite surprised when white resigned this match, I thought it was fairly even. Engine says black does have a lead, though, albeit a slim one.
No zugzwang, but black just picks up all the pawns from c2-a2, and have a winning advantage I think
honestly in that one, White played very poorly and not as agressively as he should have. it is the kings gambit and he is supposed to fight for the advantage.
my two questions are:
1)could I have won this match any faster ?
2)why did the opponent sacrifice his knight at the end of the game ? he could have atleast managed to save the time by moving it to the legal square.
and, please provide a brief report of the match.
By the way I am black in this game.
Well, I know that I had a great advantage over my opponent by the time I put his queen out of the game and confined his rook in the corner. However, my opponent managed to get the rook our towards the end of the game. I am pretty sure that I made some mistakes in regards to allowing that to happen, but I am not sure what mistakes I made. Was there faster way for me to win this game? If so, how?
Thanks for your opinion but, I personally think developing my pieces are my major priority. I personally don't think opening matters much anyway.
I challenge you to a match , what's the reply ?
let's see whether you can prove that openings are Important. personally, I don't care about my opening play much. my idea is to develop my pieces as safe as possible in a short amount of moves.
no, that's not the reason. you underestimated my thinking prowess. I want to show my full potential to you. I just had a look, your blitz rating is 1895 so, I think you will be more than worth my opponent. so, it's your call whether you are up for a match or not.
Question: What do the numbers (e.g., -1.81) refer to that are posted after each move in games that I have the computer analyze? I recognize that blunders have larger negative scores, but many of the "agreed" upon moves are low or negative point values.
0 means equal game(+/- 0.25 wouldnt matter much). +ve means white's advantage. generally +1 could be attributed to one pawn advantage. But in diff situations/positions its meaning may differ. below 1 means white has a slight advantage. above 2 means white should have winning advantage. same goes for black for -ve pts.
In my opinion ur opening wasnt too bad, just average. For one, it wasnt a famous named opening, which was probably why ur opponent played a very dubious one. generally opening wouldnt matter if u can avoid blunders in middlegame when u r under pressure(assuming ur opponent plays a better one).
Having said that since every opponent isnt the same(and familiar with diff openings/positions), so u will meet somebody who can pick on ur slight mistakes and make position very unpleasant for you. for example - e4 openings are very sharp early on and it may prove to be a blunder to play Nc6 instead of Nf6. similarly d4 openings, though slower, will sting you once u hv played about 10-15 moves. u wouldnt even know exactly where u went wrong(if u are only concentrating on piece development - without any order).
So, Even though it may not matter most of the times(at our lvl), other than piece development, openings have two more aspects - order of piece development and tempi/tempo.
Thanks Xwarriour. I'll look over my computer analyses now with a new eye.
Can some one please analyse what i did wrong except the move 36. I was playing first time in a USCF rated tournament
Anyone know what blacks opening here is?
E4 nc6 2 Nc3 ne5. 3 f4 nc6 4 Bc4 nb8. 5 nf3 e6 0-0 g6. 7 ng5 Bg7. 8 nxf7 kxf7. 9 f5 nf6 10. E5 d5
11 exf6 dxc4. 12. Fxg7 kxg7. 13. D3 exf5. 14 qf3
C6. 15 Bf4. Qd4 ck. 16 Be3. Qg4. 17 Bd4 ck. Qxd4 ck. 18. Qf2. Qxf2 ck. 19 rxf2. Cxd3. 20 re1 nd7
21 cxd3. Nf6. 22 d4 re8. 23 ree2. Rxe2. 24 Rxe2 Bd7. 25 re7 ck. Kf8. 26. Re5. Re8 27. White resigns! This game was played last night may 3 on multiplayer chess by me. Anyone know opening I played as black?
Chess: The new rigged game
by aerodarts a few minutes ago
Studying openings is highly UNDERrated!
by Fiveofswords a few minutes ago
1001-2000 worst things to do while playing chess
by twighead 2 minutes ago
Theories and speculations regarding Topalovs training routine
by fiolmattias 3 minutes ago
8/28/2015 - Back Problems, Ouch!
by robertkeitz111 8 minutes ago
no se me desbloquea acceso total
by Pulpofeira 20 minutes ago
Can you have fun when you keep loosing ?
by Whip_Kitten 26 minutes ago
by Whip_Kitten 28 minutes ago
Addium and chess. How will this new brain drug affect the chess world? Good bad or ugly?
by Squishey 29 minutes ago
White to play and mate in 2 (4th puzzle)
by Samantha212 30 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!