Post your game for expert analysis

  • 12 months ago · Quote · #701


    I'll be on this evening to post a few games.  Things got busy with work!

  • 11 months ago · Quote · #702


    I was quite surprised when white resigned this match, I thought it was fairly even. Engine says black does have a lead, though, albeit a slim one.


  • 11 months ago · Quote · #703


    NFX0992 wrote:

    I was quite surprised when white resigned this match, I thought it was fairly even. Engine says black does have a lead, though, albeit a slim one.



    No zugzwang, but black just picks up all the pawns from c2-a2, and have a winning advantage I think

  • 11 months ago · Quote · #704


    honestly in that one, White played very poorly and not as agressively as he should have. it is the kings gambit and he is supposed to fight for the advantage.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #705


  • 10 months ago · Quote · #706


  • 10 months ago · Quote · #707


    my two questions are:

    1)could I have won this match any faster ?

    2)why did the opponent sacrifice his knight at the end of the game ? he could have atleast managed to save the time by moving it to the legal square.

    and, please provide a brief report of the match.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #708


    By the way I am black in this game.

    Well, I know that I had a great advantage over my opponent by the time I put his queen out of the game and confined his rook in the corner. However, my opponent managed to get the rook our towards the end of the game. I am pretty sure that I made some mistakes in regards to allowing that to happen, but I am not sure what mistakes I made. Was there faster way for me to win this game? If so, how?

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #709



    Thanks for your opinion but, I personally think developing my pieces are my major priority. I personally don't think opening matters much anyway.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #710



    I challenge you to a match , what's the reply ?

    let's see whether you can prove that openings are Important. personally, I don't care about my opening play much. my idea is to develop my pieces as safe as possible in a short amount of moves.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #711


    no, that's not the reason. you underestimated my thinking prowess. I want to show my full potential to you. I just had a look, your blitz rating is 1895 so, I think you will be more than worth my opponent. so, it's your call whether you are up for a match or not.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #712


    Question: What do the numbers (e.g., -1.81) refer to that are posted after each move in games that I have the computer analyze? I recognize that blunders have larger negative scores, but many of the "agreed" upon moves are low or negative point values. 

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #713



    0 means equal game(+/- 0.25 wouldnt matter much). +ve means white's advantage. generally +1 could be attributed to one pawn advantage. But in diff situations/positions its meaning may differ. below 1 means white has a slight advantage. above 2 means white should have winning advantage. same goes for black for -ve pts.



    In my opinion ur opening wasnt too bad, just average. For one, it wasnt a famous named opening, which was probably why ur opponent played a very dubious one. generally opening wouldnt matter if u can avoid blunders in middlegame when u r under pressure(assuming ur opponent plays a better one).

    Having said that since every opponent isnt the same(and familiar with diff openings/positions), so u will meet somebody who can pick on ur slight mistakes and make position very unpleasant for you. for example - e4 openings are very sharp early on and it may prove to be a blunder to play Nc6 instead of Nf6. similarly d4 openings, though slower, will sting you once u hv played about 10-15 moves. u wouldnt even know exactly where u went wrong(if u are only concentrating on piece development - without any order).

    So, Even though it may not matter most of the times(at our lvl), other than piece development, openings have two more aspects - order of piece development and tempi/tempo.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #714


    Thanks Xwarriour. I'll look over my computer analyses now with a new eye.

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #715


  • 7 months ago · Quote · #716


  • 7 months ago · Quote · #717


    Can some one please analyse what i did wrong except the move 36. I was playing first time in a USCF rated tournament

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #718


    Anyone know what blacks opening here is?

    E4 nc6 2 Nc3 ne5. 3 f4 nc6 4 Bc4 nb8. 5 nf3 e6 0-0 g6. 7 ng5 Bg7. 8 nxf7 kxf7. 9 f5 nf6 10. E5 d5

    11 exf6 dxc4. 12. Fxg7 kxg7. 13. D3 exf5. 14 qf3

    C6. 15 Bf4. Qd4 ck. 16 Be3. Qg4. 17 Bd4 ck. Qxd4 ck. 18. Qf2. Qxf2 ck. 19 rxf2. Cxd3. 20 re1 nd7

    21 cxd3. Nf6. 22 d4 re8. 23 ree2. Rxe2. 24 Rxe2 Bd7. 25 re7 ck. Kf8. 26. Re5. Re8 27. White resigns! This game was played last night may 3 on multiplayer chess by me. Anyone know opening I played as black?

Back to Top

Post your reply: