nice
0 inaccuracies, 0 mistakes, and 0 blunders! WOOOOHOOO
Sort:
Im drinking old stale water
After 7 o-o Black should have moved 7...D5 and none of that would have been possible.
not too bad at chess?
@ReasonableDoubt, when I ran this game through a computer analysis at 2500 strength, this move you speak of was deemed playable and received not an inaccuracy or anything.
What would you know. Sour grapes. You sound like fezzik.
If you were playing Kasparov, you would have destroyed him or at least he would have offered a draw by move 11 since he'd have absolutely no advantage over you and would be losing even with absolute best play since you moved first...congratulations, Kasparov-Krusher.
If the shoe fits, fezzik.
Ah...a denial and a counter attack. My uncle has confirmed it, fezzik. No escape for you now. It must feel like de ja vue all over again.
nice game, is it wrong for black to take the bishop?
Nice game, VeryBad!
Don't let one party pooper spoil your celebration, either.
ReasonableDoubt wrote:
I wouldn't call this a perfect game.
Neither did the OP. The OP simply described the game in terms of the standard of "inaccuracy" given by the chess.com analysis engine. By the comment in the first post and the emoticon, the OP is well aware that even passing this imperfect standard was only possibly because his opponent erred out of the opening.
I think the OP is just having a little fun over an achievement they rarely get. No one is claiming chess perfection here.
All black has to do is throw in a zwischenzug to defend against the threats from the bishops, and the pawn fork becomes real, you win the piece back and have a better position. It was greedy to take the rook.
Just throw in f6 - defends the e5 pawn, denies the c1 bishop.
ponnupazoozu wrote:
Perhaps the logic in RD's explanation is being missed in the cloud of his criticism which contrasted heavily with the happy mood created by the OP's posting.
It was more breezy, than happy. With a noticeable tree-blowing sound. The OP created a sense of dance in nature
The whole point of chess is to win. I would rather play the game that I won than the game that I "should of".
These days, we tend to over analyze and critique everything to death. And here we have a nice win, indeed. Bravo.
Winning isn't the only thing...it's everything. That assumes doing so with honor, at least for me.
Losing? Feels to me that someone just sat on your bag of potato chips. Not my idea of fun.
The only good thing that comes from losing is a sheer will power to learn, get better and win against the same person with whom you've lost.
No such thing as "warm cheese"; it's either cool or hot - no middle ground.
oinquarki wrote:
No such thing as "warm cheese"; it's either cool or hot - no middle ground.
What the hell is "luke-warm"? How does it differ from warm? And does "luke-warm" apply to cheese?
it was a short one though :p