Countering the Scandinavian/Center counter defense

Sort:
pdve

Likhit1

27 April!

Gloomshroom

You mean countering the Scandinavian when Black plays poorly? :D

pdve

I agree. Black played passively and just let things happen not the best thing to do when attacked viciously

Likhit1
pdve wrote:

I agree. Black played passively and just let things happen not the best thing to do when attacked viciously

Forget that,tell me how you went to the future first.

Shivsky

My first reaction: Derail this thread and make it all about time-travel.

My final reaction: A nice game and you found some good shots (Nb5 had all kinds of cuteness about it!)   Your opponent should have played this way better than he should with an opening (one of my favorites) like this.  Then again, it is blitz and maybe he's just "trying it out" for a test-drive.


pfren

Ummm, sorry for my ignorance, but WHERE Black did play passively? I'd rather say quite the opposite- he played actively, and riskily.

White's opening was a failure. Black simply had to take on b4 at move 14, when white does not have compensation- instead of the blunder 14...Qa3? which loses to the move played (15.Nb5).

pdve

i think that's probably correct. b4 was a risky move though i wouldn't go as far as saying it is a mistake

jonnin

I used to play against this a lot, and for a while I used it as well. 

A nice setup, black castled into a strong attack and gave away his own attack pretty early.  The rook fleeing after capture gave white the tempo to clean house.

IMHO black should NOT take the pawn with the queen.  The queen becomes a liability as you avoid minor pieces and pawns. 

I would not have taken b4 as black.  The open file vs your king and with 2 bishops and a queen already pointed there?? Qe5 maybe, looking at Be4 if allowed after that.

pfren
jonnin wrote:
I would not have taken b4 as black.

No worries- any patzer wouldn't.

pdve

Taking the b4 pawn would have given me sort of initiative. Donno if that would be enough.

trigs

lol, i love when the guys rated 1500 argue with the the guy rated 2300+.

Clemenz
trigs wrote:

lol, i love when the guys rated 1500 argue with the the guy rated 2300+.

pfren is really rude. littleman syndrome?

Fear_ItseIf

what are the numbers in the annontations meant to represent?

trigs
Clemenz wrote:
trigs wrote:

lol, i love when the guys rated 1500 argue with the the guy rated 2300+.

pfren is really rude. littleman syndrome?

agreed. but he's usually correct.

pfren

To be honest, I don't pay the slightest fook about what retards think about me.

Clemenz
trigs wrote:
Clemenz wrote:
trigs wrote:

lol, i love when the guys rated 1500 argue with the the guy rated 2300+.

pfren is really rude. littleman syndrome?

agreed. but he's usually correct.

somebody should re-post everything valuable that pfren happens to post minus the weak trolling, that way everyone else can block him.

pfren
Clemenz wrote:
somebody should re-post everything valuable that pfren happens to post minus the weak trolling, that way everyone else can block him.

One could also re-post everything valuable you have posted. All he would need is a blank sheet of paper, and no pencil.

zborg

I vote for IM @Pfren as Chess.com's winner of the Richard Gere look-a-like contest.

More power to him.  Smile

trigs
pfren wrote:
Clemenz wrote:
somebody should re-post everything valuable that pfren happens to post minus the weak trolling, that way everyone else can block him.

One could also re-post everything valuable you have posted. All he would need is a blank sheet of paper, and no pencil.

okay...that's funny.