A dropping off of ability in any activity will occur if it is not engaged in for a significant period.
Is it common for a player to become rusty if he does't play for a long time?
Now everyone is thinking of......
tiddlywinks?
Including tiddlywinks.
Then I'd question the specifics of your "break" and the way you measure yourself before and after.
E.g. not a single game of any type (casual or tournament) for 35 years. Then coming back, playing in 5 tournaments, and maintaining the same rating.
As I said, I wasn't that good (maybe around 1700 OTB, 144 in British rating if that means anything to you). It's more through looking at my old games and comparing them with now; I think I would have given myself a reasonable game within a few weeks but who knows. Tournaments though are very stressful - only ever played a few of those. I do think chess knowledge and principles stick pretty well, though once you are into expert play it is probably much more difficult, but I was never that standard.
But I didn't play a serious game between 18 and 53.
I think it's hard to know just looking at games. The strategy sticks with us a long time, I think you're right. The problem is we can't calculate well and miss lots of tactics.
Yes, my tactics were poor when I restarted. One game early on (I think it was a fried-liver attack or something similar) I was completely steam-rollered in a way that never happened back in the day. That was demoralising. But I've sharpened up a bit since, and the Tactics Trainer on here has shown me a lot of stuff I'd never have seen back when I used to play OTB.
The internet is really great for improving at chess; I used to play at most a couple of games a week against reasonable players back then, so progress was slow.
my play probably dropped like 200-300 points easily after i stopped playing seriously