11981 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I(N/S)TJ, depending on the questions. I always have been crap at chess, but like to play.
I'm an ENTP. I'm not the loudest person around--but I am around the club! And everyone knows they can distract me by starting up an interesting conversation near me... I have a reputation for unorthodox openings and playing almost purely positional middlegames. Even my "respectable" openings are highly asymmetrical: Reti system, Nimzo, QID... Calculation can't be avoided, but I generally "feel" the squares and the pressure on them, rather than counting, and I put pieces "where they need to be" more than follow specific middlegame plans. My endgame sucks, partially because I focus more on getting a good, complex middlegame than a favorable endgame, and partially because it's BORING. I make speculative material sacrifices to improve my position more often than other players at my level (class B), and am far more likely to sacrifice excess material in a middlegame attack than I am to sit on it through a comfortable endgame. Also, I love analyzing games by discussing possibilities with strong players, and I think I learn a lot more from that than by reading books (which I also do).
Anyone who takes a Myers Briggs Test is crazy. Anyone who administers one is:
INTP here. I thought there would be more INTJ players, maybe because Bobby Fischer has such a big impact on chess perception as a pure INTJ. But I think again and see much chess masters of the past and present as INTP (Kasparov, Karpov, maybe Carlsen). Of course it is all interpretation and we could not know how they really are/were. Here is my take on the results:Introversion is not essential to be a good chess player, in my opinion, but I think much introvert people are attracted to this type of activity. It is thus understandable to see more introvert players.
Intuition, on the other hand, is quite useful when you struggle to find a good recovery or a suprising attack in a tense position. Sensing would be better when it comes to knowing patterns and perhaps reacting quickly in rapid games. I still feel intuition would be slightly superior in chess but that's my opinion.
As of thinking, it is quite obvious that we should see a majority of chess players with it, althought it doesn't mean you cannot have emotions and play chess.
Perception/Judgement would be the most diverse category regarding chess because good players could be either way. Perceptive players would imagine complex schemes and positions to blow the opponent defense while judging players might have a stronger sense of "correctness" regarding their own pawn structures and development. If you see a player say "you might have played this or that with different results" they are perceptive I think while someone saying "this was a bad move, Xyz is clearly winning here" would be more of a judging player.
INTP, INTJ and perhaps ISTX are the personalities we should expect seing in chess players but, again, it is just another test where the results may easily be far from reality. So nobody should be discouraged by these kind of classifications. If you like to play chess, it is still the strongest indicator that you should play it.
Between my MBTI judgment and my experience playing people I know well enough to type, I would say S helps a lot with memorizing opening lines, with playing endgames, and with utilizing traps and standard tactics. N is better for positional middlegames and strange positions. The TP combination signifies "introverted thinking" (Ti), which is probably best suited to finding the best move, while the TJ combination signifies "extroverted thinking" (Te), which is probably better at spotting potential tactical combinations
Seems like I'm the only INFJ here
I am ISTJ. I just think this is a quick and dirty version since you can just select one style even if it is not in reality what you might be.
ISTP here. Took MBTI / Strong's twice. Was in chess club in school. Now pushing 50 and never get tired of it. I do better when I am not eating and playing chess at the same time. But i hardly have time so play during lunch and supper. Live in the 700 -800s blitzing. I think my functional stack keeps me from taking it too seriously and the tertiary Ni probably doesn't help. I am Ti dominant with auxiliary Se. The introversion probably keeps me coming back for more. I am betting on alot of Ni's here. Sis is an Ni and lots of fun to "take apart and put back together" but I have never been able to "fix" her. She likes chess too but won't play with me. Says I talk too much. ....Please be relevant, helpful & nice!
12/18/2014 - Mate in 4
by BoardOfWar a few minutes ago
Why does white always move first, isn't this giving white an unfair advantage?
by Ellie47 a few minutes ago
by Hadron 6 minutes ago
by Hadron 10 minutes ago
by Hadron 12 minutes ago
Worst Loss Yet: Drawing Board
by BoardOfWar 14 minutes ago
WHY? is this horrible opening so popular for white ?
by Hadron 17 minutes ago
How many distinct chess games are possible, and which is the longest?
by Remellion 20 minutes ago
Let's Gambit! Wait... should I?
by isaacthebird 20 minutes ago
Was castling two moves EARLIER?
by AnarchyBrian 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!