11337 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Rossmeister, just in case, wanted to let you know mzg2001 is not me. I would not make comments like that.
Move clocks do change the game and they should be an option, i.e., you can choose an x minute move clock and only match up to players who have opted to play with a move clock.
This is online chess, not tournament chess. We all have lives to live and it's really hard to save the world when your sitting in front screen that never moves.
+1 for Mattymar's idea of a "presence check". May be better than a move clock since it does not change the game. At least the afker would have to return periodically.
Keep it simple though, no weighing material differences, just pop-up an alert after 5 minutes of inactivity then give them one minute to respond. And let the other player know they have responded.
We need a move clock. I play 30 minute games and on other chess sites they have a 5 min move clock. If you don't make a move in 5 minutes you are auto-resigned. There is a move clock dislayed with the gme clock and it changes color when you have 90 seconds left, to alert you. It is a very fair and much less frustrating way to play.
Why should anyone be forced to make a move within a certain time period? You sign up to play a 30 minute game, your opponent has a right to use his time as they see fit. You dont have rediculous rules like this in OTB play, so why in online play?
Should Holt get penalized a loss because he took 50 minutes to make a move?
We don't have rules like this in OTB play because, in general, we don't have ridiculous BEHAVIOR like this in OTB play. In a 30 minute game, in person against a live opponent and in front of live spectators, who is going to let the clock run out and force their opponent to wait in a clearly lost position?In online play, this social pressure to not be a jerk is not there. Chess.com, as a privately run business, is thus choosing to take steps to discourage people from being jerks. Good for them.
WTF! This subject was posted 4 years ago!
Bad lag on this site.
Not a lag, I was new to chess.com and looked through the posts before starting a new thread. This one seemed relevant so I posted here.
capnpaco nailed it, basically saying online chess requires some controls not needed n OTB play to make it enjoyable for us who actually want to play. The thing is chess.com is not doing enough to discourage jerks. They say that repeated bad behavior will result in sanctions but we still have a lot of bad behavior so we need something more immediate. We need an optional move clock and/or a presence check as suggested by Mattymar.
Why don't you just arm us to mete out instant justice?
Would if I could kaynight.
Shoudn't timing out be counted as a loss,otherwise any one losing a game could just abandon it and not lose any points. Have I uncovered a loophole in the scoring? I usually play 3 day games and many were abandoned after a few moves
No excuse for such catty, bitchy, girly, sulky unsportsman-like behaviour. Letting your time run out when it's mate in 2 or mate in 1 shows that you're scum basically. I'm playing someone who's 1 move away from a forced mate and he's stopped playing with 16 hours left on his clock, I bet he's going to let it run out but we'll see, perhaps he got called away.I've played people in the past who've let their time run out when it's a forced mate, I don't understand petty little worms like that.
No, it doesn't.
Chess.com encourages players to be kind and show good sportsmanship. Our Fair Play policy expects that players will not: intentionally disconnect during games stall to make opponents wait unnecessarily frivolously abort games because they don't want to play black, etc.If their account is flagged for breaking this policy they account will be restricted. They will still be able to play games with friends or accept direct challenges, but they will not be able to create or accept open challenges until they play more games that follow the fair play policy. Their game behavior is detected by our server
Gawwd.. You would think your grandmother had just been murdered, get a grip Sabre.
Best Chess.com members.
by letsgohome 3 minutes ago
Have identical games ever occured?
by chessmicky 4 minutes ago
Lag, it's a problem
by Nunyanunya 4 minutes ago
Help me solve this gigantic hole in my repertoire: 1. Nf3 g6
by chessterd5 5 minutes ago
8/1/2015 - GM Shirov - GM Volokitin, Russian Club Cup, 2009
by 6RingNation 5 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by Caedrel 5 minutes ago
QGA--What do you do if Black tries to keep pawn?
by K_Brown 5 minutes ago
Review: GM Pavasovic chess set by Noj Slovenia
by Eyechess 7 minutes ago
Where to study deep chess openings?
by Ed_Seedhouse 7 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Top 10
by passedpawn2013 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!