This is for us to share our fav vids. Pls keep them Christian orientated if possible.
I will start with this one.
This is a Shockingly Powerful & Biblical message preached to about 5,000 youth in a day when youth are appealed to through shallow and worldly means. At one point in this sermon the 5,000 Youth are clapping and yelling BUT THEN the preacher makes a comment that CHANGES THE WHOLE ATMOSPHERE TO WHERE YOU COULD HAVE HEARD A PIN DROP... As you can imagine, the preacher was never invited back. We believe the whole sermon will be a blessing to many souls. Note: HeartCry Missionary Society offers a DVD of this message. Contact them at: aglass@heartcrymissionary.com
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=19fd9c84c942a08316e0
This is also something i found of www.tangle.com
I believe this is the best biblical way to share the gospel. It is called hells best kept secret.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=bb01943234bce7bf8453
The truth about the church today.
A challenging compilation showing just how far we have fallen away from the Biblical standard and from the early church that Jesus built - hold on to your seat!!! www.HolyDesperation.com I highly recommend everyone watch this 10min pres.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=8f99cb94dc9b88e97ba0
To those who won't be satisfied until they have Gods presense in their lives...Seek after God with all your worth dear saints!
Video 1
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=27e0d7f78d6217d16cd4
Video 2
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ff3854ad0d8d990b886e
Video 3
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f7bdb8057abfeaf6af10
Video 4
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ae47b5d2ed4a2857b84b
Prior to the culmination of end times events there is a rebellion to take place where ultimately people living on planet earth will offer allegiance to Satan's man of sin, Antichrist. More on the subject of falling away as the Bible describes it here. When i was watching this, It made so much sense when u read the word why so many fall away and sometimes without realising it. Let us love them and pray for them.
Matthew 24:10-14, 24
10At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other, 11and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people. 12Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold, 13but he who stands firm to the end will be saved. 14And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
24For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and miracles to deceive even the elect—if that were possible. 25See, I have told you ahead of time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f29717fb0cc1309b1d9b
Here is Historical proof Jesus Christ existed from outside sources.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=b3184064fd90d830a94b
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1f46b340bdb3acd94587
thank you brother ... i will eat of all that is served in the table of the Lamb of GOD.
Here are three 10 minute video's that teach on true grace, God's love for us and Christs second coming. Very good watching and listening video's indeed.
http://www.holydesperation.com/hdVideo.php?videoKey=jZoJqZUXIz4&title=The|True|Grace|of|God
http://www.holydesperation.com/hdVideo.php?videoKey=3xhTawaMTgk&title=You|Can|Come|Back|to|His|Love
http://www.holydesperation.com/hdVideo.php?videoKey=At-DdmumQic&title=The|Second|Coming|of|Christ
This is a responce from someone on tangle about the film Zeitgeist.
Since so many have been deceived by the original film, this video shows how unfounded the ideas that Christianity was invented from numerous ancient mystery myths are. So enjoy everyone! :-)
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=7e74adf384b0f21be308
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=bc90949e1d6742994858
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=8401bddd1a913b1761c2
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=704f3a4ff51cc2f28861
Scientific evidence and reasons for the bible.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=d05a1520ff8c337c14cf
This fascinating documentary dissects the detailed Messianic prophecies foretold by Hebrew prophets hundreds of years before Yahshua Jesus Christ's birth. The prophecies correctly predicted the tragic string of events that would befall the Savior before his final week on earth, including his betrayal, crucifixtion and subsequent resurrection.
Part 1
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=e84da2c708b47e7bab9c
Part 2
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ef61f527cfc151c29849
Part 3
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=7c695ea28f9dc6a36a47
Part 4
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=b17c27c61b4fdb928b35
Part 5
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=8f88ee42b39d86cf7a35
Part 6/ Final part of this series.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=eb36fd186aaa04ce3ea4
Lee Strobel on The John Ankerberg Show. In this 5 part series.
Lee Strobel tackles some of the most recent attacks on Jesus and the bible and shows how ridiculous these arguments really are. Also u can visit his web site www.leestrobel.com for more info on him and his ministry. Lee strobel was a former atheist who after seeing the evidences for Jesus and the bible became a Christian and has authored numerous books including (The case for the real Jesus) which addresses a lot of these new attacks on Jesus and Christianity.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=0a91dcb523bf4c6cdbd6
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=953d347bb4ffbef897e9
Part 3 Has some Muslim objections responded too.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=75f8081b5bdce7d5a167
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=dba90b983a4227d2d939
This is about the second coming of Jesus Christ.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=bea43d1b44f09d89f020
This is a documentary about the Shroud Of Turin.
Showing us once again we have something strong in regards to our faith in Jesus.
Part 1 23:41 mins long
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f9623f0261171673a7df
Part 2 19:49 mins long.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=9b12398b25245f602390
Here is another aspect on the shroud of Torin i thought u might like.
Turin Shroud Hologram Reveals Words "The Lamb"
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=8399a21743fc4aec4829
This is a video for anyone who couldn't be bothered to read the lengthy article.
Does The Bible Condone Slavery? 13:37mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=34000ed3befa4f78691e
Human Evolution? What Does The Evidence Really Say?
The large variety of hominid (man or ape-like) fossils that we do have piece-meal records of are overwhelmingly characterized by overlapping histories of 'distinctively different and stable' hominid species during the entire time, and the entire geography, each hominid species is found in the fossil record. There is never a clear transition between ANY of the different hominid species no matter where, or in what era, the hominid fossils are found. "If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and showed him the meagre evidence we've got he'd surely say, "forget it; there isn't enough to go on." David Pilbeam, Harvard University paleoanthropologist: from Richard E. Leakey's book, The Making of Mankind, Sphere Books Limited, Barcelona, 1982, p. 43. Even Lucy the supposed non-questionable "missing link of human evolution" has recently been completely overthrown from her lofty status as irrefutable proof for human evolution: Israeli Researchers: 'Lucy' is not direct ancestor of humans"; Apr 16, 2007http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1176152801536http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/literature/2007/04/24/lucy_demoted_from_the_human_ancestral_li New Fossil Ape May Shake Human Family Tree August 22, 2007 (note; the word "Shake" was originally "Shatter" until the National Geographic magazine realized it made Darwinism look bad)http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/08/070822-fossil-ape.html "The australopithecines (Lucy) known over the last several decades from Olduvai and Sterkfontein, Kromdraai and Makapansgat, are now irrevocably removed from a place in a group any closer to humans than to African apes and certainly from any place in a direct human lineage. (Charles Oxnard, former director of graduate studies and professor of anatomy at the University of Southern California Medical School) But what is the basis for the human evolution thesis put forward by evolutionists? It is the existence of plenty of fossils on which evolutionists are able to build imaginary interpretations. Throughout history, more than 6,000 distinct species of ape have lived, and most of them have become extinct. Today, only 120 species live on the earth. These 6,000 or so species of ape, most of which are extinct, constitute a rich resource for the evolutionists to build imaginary interpretations with. Contrary the NCSE's claim of 'considerable agreement,' the field of human origins (paleoanthropology) is actually one of the most contentious in biology. According to experts in the field, this is because of subjective interpretations of the relatively meager evidence. Berkeley evolutionary biologist F. Clark Howell wrote in 1996: 'There is no encompassing theory of [human] evolution... Alas, there never really has been.' According to Howell, the field is characterized by 'narrative treatments' based on little evidence, so 'it is probably true that an encompassing scenario' of human evolution 'is beyond our grasp, now if not forever.' Arizona State University paleoanthropologist Geoffrey Clark was equally pessimistic in 1997: 'Scientists have been trying to arrive at a consensus about modern human origins for more than a century. Why haven't they been successful?' Clark is convinced it is because paleoanthropologists proceed from different 'biases, preconceptions and assumptions.' And in 1999 Henry Gee, chief science writer for Nature, pointed out that all the evidence for human evolution 'between about 10 and 5 million years ago--several thousand generations of living creatures--can be fitted into a small box.' According to Gee, the conventional picture of human evolution as lines of ancestry and descent is 'a completely human invention created after the fact, shaped to accord with human prejudices.' (21) Jonathan Wells PhD. As well comprehensive genetic analysis of the entire human race reveals a startling fact: In the differences of human races we find that the younger races (Chinese, Europeans, American Indians, etc.. etc..) are losing genetic information (genetic diversity) when compared to the original race of humans that is thought to have migrated out of east Africa some 50,000 years ago. "We found an enormous amount of diversity within and between the African populations, and we found much less diversity in non-African populations," Tishkoff told attendees today (Jan. 22) at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Anaheim. "Only a small subset of the diversity in Africa is found in Europe and the Middle East, and an even narrower set is found in American Indians." Tishkoff; Andrew Clark, Penn State; Kenneth Kidd, Yale University; Giovanni Destro-Bisol, University "La Sapienza," Rome, and Himla Soodyall and Trefor Jenkins, WITS University, South Africa, looked at three locations on DNA samples from 13 to 18 populations in Africa and 30 to 45 populations in the remainder of the world. I would also like to point out that materialists have always made many false presumptions in the face of unknown facts. For instance, for many years they presumed much of human anatomy was vestigial. Yet once again, they were proven wrong in their presumption. "The thyroid gland, pituitary gland, thymus, pineal gland, and coccyx, once considered useless by evolutionists, are now known to have important functions. The list of 180 'vestigial' structures is practically down to zero. Unfortunately, earlier Darwinists assumed that if they were ignorant of an organ's function, then it had no function.' Tornado in a Junkyard, the Relentless Myth of Darwinism by James Perloff As well the appendix has recently been found to have essential purpose in October 2007:http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071005/ap_on_he_me/appendix_s_purpose;_ylt=AvGgR5cX3AwvbW.K6iVVH$@@$$0NUE For an example of "forcing the evidence", naturalists/materialists LIKE TO say that evolution is proven true when we look at the 98.8% similarity between certain segments of the DNA in a Chimpanzee and compare them with the same segments of DNA of a Human. Yet that similarity was not nearly good enough to be considered 'conclusive' scientific proof. For starters, recent preliminary comparisons of the "gene sequences" of chimps and of man yield a similarity of only 96%. As well, the December 2006 issue of PLoS ONE reported that human and chimpanzee gene copy numbers differ by 6.4% (Hahn). Whereas, Dr. Hugh Ross states the similarity may in actuality be closer to 85% to 90% when taking into account the chimp genome is about 12% larger than the human genome. A recent, more accurate, Study in 2008, which actually compared the entire genomes of Chimpanzees and Humans side by side (Letter to Letter) found the similarity at below 70%! Chimpanzee? 10-10-2008 - Dr Richard Buggs ...Therefore the total similarity of the genomes could be below 70%.http://www.refdag.nl/artikel/1366432/Chimpanzee.html Dr Richard Buggs is a research geneticist at the University of Florida. Secondarily, at the protein level only 29% of genes code for the exact same amino acid sequences in chimps and humans (Nature, 2005)(Proteins are known to be highly isolated and constrained into "functionality islands"). As well, our DNA is 92% similar to mice as well as 92% similar to zebrafish (Simmons PhD., Billions of Missing Links). So are we 92% mouse or are we 92% zebrafish? Our DNA is 70% similar to a fruit fly; So are we therefore 70% fruit fly? Our DNA is 75% similar to a worm; So are we 75% worm? Decoding the dogma of DNA similarityhttp://creationontheweb.com/content/view/5111 This type of reasoning (choosing only the data that can be made to fit your theory) is simple minded in its approach and clearly flawed in establishing a solid scientific foundation on which to draw valid inferences from! Clearly, we must find if the DNA is flexible enough to accommodate any type of mutations happening to it in the first place. This one point of evidence, (The actual flexibility of DNA to any random mutations), must be firmly established, first and foremost, before we can draw any meaningful inferences from the genetic data we gather from organisms!! Fortunately we, through the miracle of science, can now establish this crucial point of DNA flexibility. The primary thing that is crushing to the evolutionary theory is this fact. Of the random mutations that do occur, and have manifested traits in organisms that can be measured, at the very least 999,999 out of 1,000,000 (99.9999%) of these mutations to the DNA have been found to produce traits in organisms that are harmful and/or fa^tal to the life-form having the mutation! (Gerrish and Lenski, 1998, Bataillon, 2000, Elena et al, 1998). "I have seen estimates of the incidence of the ratio of deleterious-to-beneficial mutations which range from one in one thousand up to one in one million. The best estimates seem to be one in one million (Gerrish and Lenski, 1998). The actual rate of beneficial mutations is so extremely low as to thwart any actual measurement (Bataillon, 2000, Elena et al, 1998). Therefore, I cannot ...accurately represent how rare such beneficial mutations really are." (Sanford; Genetic Entropy page 24) The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an ase^xual population (Philip J. Gerrish & Richard E. Lenski) "Clonal interference is not the only dynamic that inhibits the progression of beneficial mutations to fixation in an ase^xual population.Asimilar inhibition may be caused by Muller's ratchet (Muller, 1964; Haigh, 1978), in which deleterious mutations will tend to accumulate in small ase^xual populations. As shown by Manning and Thompson (1984) and by Peck (1994), the fate of a beneficial mutation is determined as much by the selective disadvantage of any deleterious mutations with which it is linked as by its own selective advantage."http://myxo.css.msu.edu/lenski/pdf/1998,%20Genetica,%20Gerrish%20&%20Lenski.pdf ' Bergman (2004) has studied the topic of beneficial mutations. Among other things, he did a simple literature search via Biological Abstracts and Medline. He found 453,732 'mutation' hits, but among these only 186 mentioned the word 'beneficial' (about 4 in 10,000). When those 186 references were reviewed, almost all the presumed 'beneficial mutations' were only beneficial in a very narrow sense- but each mutation consistently involved loss of function changes-hence loss of information.' Trying to find an actual "hard" number for the "truly" beneficial mutation rate is, in fact, what Dr. Behe tried to do in his book "The Edge of Evolution". Dr. Behe states in Edge of Evolution on page 135. Generating a single new cellular protein-protein binding site (in other words, generating a truly beneficial mutational event that would explain the generation of the complexity we see in life) is of the same order of difficulty or worse than the development of chloroquine resistance in the malarial parasite. That order of difficulty is put at 10^20 replications (births) of the malarial parasite, by Dr. Behe. The likelihood of developing two binding sites in a protein complex would be the square of of the probability of developing one: a double CCC (chloroquine complexity cluster), 10^20 times 10^20, which is 10^40. There have likely been fewer than 10^40 cells in the entire world in the past 4 billion years, so the odds are against a single event of this variety (just 2 binding sites being generated by accident) in the history of life. It is biologically unreasonable. Dr. Michael J. Behe PhD. (from page 146 of his book "Edge of Evolution") Thus, the actual rate for "truly" beneficial mutations, that would account for the complexity we see in life, is far in excess of one-hundred-billion-billion mutational events. Thus, this one in a million number, that is often bantered about for truly beneficial mutations, is actually far, far too generous for the evolutionists to be using for their hypothetical calculations. In fact, from consistent findings such as these, it is increasingly apparent that Genetic Entropy is the overriding foundational rule for all of biology, with no exceptions at all, and that the belief in "truly" beneficial mutations is nothing more than wishful speculation on the naturalists part that has no foundation in empirical science whatsoever: The foundational rule of Genetic Entropy for biology can be stated something like this: All adaptations away from a parent species for a sub-species, which increase fitness to a particular environment, will always come at a loss of the original integrated complex information in the parent species genome. Professional evolutionary biologists are hard-pressed to cite even one clear-cut example of evolution through a beneficial mutation to DNA that would violate the principle of genetic entropy. Although evolutionists try to claim the lactase persistence mutation as a lonely example of a beneficial mutation in humans, lactase persistence is actually a loss of a instruction in the genome to turn the lactase enzyme off, so the mutation clearly does not violate genetic entropy. Yet at the same time, the evidence for the detrimental nature of mutations in humans is clearly overwhelming, for doctors have already cited over 3500 mutational disorders (Dr. Gary Parker). "Mutations" by Dr. Gary Parkerhttp://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/cfol/ch2-mutations.asp Mutations: The Raw Material for Evolution?http://www.icr.org/articles/print/3466/ As esteemed French scientist Pierre P. Gras^se has stated 'What is the use of their unceasing mutations, if they do not change? In sum, the mutations of bacteria and viruses are merely hereditary fluctuations around a median position; a swing to the right, a swing to the left, but no final evolutionary effect.' 'But in all the reading I've done in the life-sciences literature, I've never found a mutation that added information' All point mutations that have been studied on the molecular level turn out to reduce the genetic information and not increase it.' Lee Spetner (Ph.D. Physics - MIT) 'There is no known law of nature, no known process and no known sequence of events which can cause information to originate by itself in matter.' Werner Gitt, 'In the Beginning was Information', 1997, p. 106. (Dr. Gitt was the Director at the German Federal Institute of Physics and Technology) "... no operation performed by a computer can create new information." -- Douglas G. Robertson, "Algorithmic Information Theory, Free Will and the Turing Test," Complexity, Vol.3, #3 Jan/Feb 1999, pp. 25-34
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=45b487faea4d53f6dbd9
This is a 6 part series where we look into evolutions claims. The one who posted this has great a deal of info to go along with the video's that's well worth reading.
Icons Of Evolution Part 1 of 6 10:16 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=088de3d70046b88fec8a
Icons Of Evolution Part 2 of 6 9:59 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=3406d776a571d0be0671
Icons Of Evolution Part 3 of 6 10:07 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=e27c0db98651be388c37
Icons Of Evolution Part 4 of 6 9:55 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=215dde6a8356824424cf
Icons Of Evolution Part 5 of 6 9:16 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=43b5a786605c36f9caaa
Icons Of Evolution Part 6 of 6 ( 5.5 minute overlap with part 5 of 6) 7:20 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=34fa1255fa1c414be52d
I really enjoyed listening to this, it sure inspires you.
This is a very powerful audio message that will stir your spirit for revival! Clips of following speakers included in this message: Ian Paisley, Leonard Ravenhill, Paris Reidhead, Duncan Campbell, A.W. Tozer, T. Austin Sparks. This is probably one of the most potent and powerful audio recordings on this entire site. You will be changed as you listen to this compilation. is missing part 5.
The Revival Hymn - Part 1 of 5 9:57 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=781139d0bf02688a5141
The Revival Hymn - Part 2 of 5 9:05 mins run time.
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=9d2e879e73c445e62fac
The Revival Hymn - Part 3 of 5
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=5d34ccab604aee7b8ac1
The Revival Hymn - Part 4 of 5
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=f532460b2110daa45e70
P.S. If any of these don't work just go into the search bar on tangle and type in the revival Hymn. You will find it all there.
Whats the 'best' evidence that God created. In this 3 part series from AIG we find out. You will be amazed by the wonders of God's creation.
http://www.answersingenesis.org/media/video/ondemand/best-evidence/best-evidence-god-created
The Lie Most Christians Believe Part One.The tithe.
Part one; Chief Apostle Eric vonAnderseck teaches about the lie that is more dangerous than evolution and the Da Vinci Code, the spell of the tithe. Why is it more dangerous than evolution and the Da Vinci Code? Because it has deep roots in the Christian faith and even to this day the doctrine of the tithe holds the church spell bound. The lie of the tithe was widely accepted before the Lord restored Apostolic Governance to the church and it remains a stronghold of Satan in many churches today. Running time:- 29:58
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=d4b46055d9f8ca28f04a
The Lie Most Christians Believe Part Two. Running time:- 29:58
http://connect.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=cdb290bab9d329a65e66
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.