Beneficial Blunders

GM MacMolner
Mar 27, 2012, 7:45 PM |

I guess you could call it a chess hangover, but it took me a week or so to recover from the 14 rated games I had played in the span of 7 days. Now that I'm ready to look back into all the chess I played, I figure it's a good opportunity to analyze my overall play and results - and to share with you the ups and downs of a crazy chess stretch!

I played two tournaments: the first was a 6 player double round robin with 3 GMs and 3 IMs. I started out slowly with a draw and a loss on the first day, but ended up with 2/4 after playing all of the GMs with Black in the first 4 games. Here is my loss:

If you read my last blog post, you might remember that I also had a painful endgame loss when I played in Gibraltar, so if the trend continues it seems like I'm due for at least one painful endgame loss in each tournament I play. Uh oh! After my loss I finished the rest of the tournament with a +3 score, and I was happy to see the positive shift in my results - I also scored an overall 4/5 with White, which hasn't happened to me in a while. So, I was happy with this tournament for the most part and I was even on the winning side of an endgame for once (see below). Before playing this tournament I was planning out some group lessons for my students and was going over the importance of the outside passed pawn and then came across a perfect example of it in one of my marathon tournament games:

I finished the tournament in second place behind GM Moradiabadi from Iran who had a good performance with 7/10 and no losses. Naturally, after traveling from Chicago to Phoenix on Friday and playing 10 games of chess - it only made sense to go home and play a game 30 tournament with 4 games on Saturday! :) I ended up tying for first place with a Belgian-Iranian IM, Mohandesi, who has recently moved out here to Arizona also. I lost 1 rating point in the game 30 tournament which felt like a big success after playing so many games in one week.

I want to finish my blog with the most interesting game I've played in a while (at least to me) which happened to be against IM Mohandesi but from the ACE Arizona State Championship a few weeks ago. The game started out with a Rauzer Sicilian that I felt happy with and by the time my opponent had played Bxd3 I already felt very confident and after a few more moves I was winning, only to "blunder" it away with a slightly careless move. It turns out that my blunder actually wins in a cooler way, eventually leading the Black queen to be dominated even though it appears she has the entire board to roam. It's a rare tactic, unlike any I saw in my marathon week of chess:

27. h5! would be extremely strong. Black would have been powerless against the threat of Rhc1 and Rxf8. The way I played in the game was not as strong and gave Black decent drawing chances. Although I would have liked to have played the strong h5! in the game it actually worked out better that I didn't.

I ended up having to grind out a slightly more pleasant position against strong opposition and in the process I learned a lot about these types of endgames. I don't think everyone else shared my enthusiasm for the endgame, though!

My next tournament is a few weeks away in Saint Louis - I'm still hunting my final GM norm, and I expect to be around 2480 FIDE after this mini-marathon is rated. People sometimes ask me if I'm discouraged or anxious because I haven't gotten my final GM norm - and as hard as it is, I have to remind myself that the final norm is just one small race in the much larger marathon of my chess career!

More from GM MacMolner
My Road to Grandmaster

My Road to Grandmaster

Learning to Study

Learning to Study