Chess Style Crisis
I'm sure you've heard of "indentity crisis" but what I am talking about here is the state when you are confused of what kind of chess style you know that you have.
Just this year I have changed my opening repertoires, and immediately noticed that my playing style has changed from tactical to positional. It is not that I wanted to play positional games but realized the opening demands it to.
I have always been an 1.e4 player as white, and as black I play the Sicilian Dragon and the King's Indian. These openings have my taste for tactical games. But because of outside responsibilities I have had difficulty keeping up with the latest theory. Thus have suffered numerous defeats in later games played.
So I have decided to changed to low maintenance and more easily grasped openings: The English as white, and as black the Hyper Accelerated Dragon and the Nimzo Indian.
To be honest I dont enjoy playing the positions arising from the new repertoires because it is not to my tactical taste. I know my style is of a tactical player but because keeping up with the latest theory has become difficult for me, I was somehow forced to swallow which isn't my style - positional.
I wonder if you have had the same dilema and what can you say about it...
See my games below for examples of my new positional style.
Interested with Sicilian Dragon systems? Click here!