Forum

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 10 min Gamerules Play for Mate, King of the Hill Promotion Off

note: the rooks are a futer

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 10 min Gamerules Play for Mate, King of the Hill Promotion Off

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 2 | 8 Gamerules Anonymous, King of the Hill, Takeover, Sideways, Stalemate Loses Promotion 1pt Queen, undefined, undefined, Wildebeest, Dragon Bishop, undefined on the 5th rank

Status: Declined Reason: Requirements not met.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 10 min Promotion King, General, Knight, Wildebeest on the 9th rank Note The original idea of this game was to implement a Crazyhouse variant of Courier Chess. However Courier Chess has the weaknesses of irregularities in the opening setup and Pawn promotion only to the second-least valuable piece. So now the pawns are all at the third rank there are a second Mann and Wildebeest in place of the Wazir and Alfils. The Ferz is also upgraded to a General.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 45 sec Gamerules Game of Points, King of the Hill, Stalemate Wins Promotion King on the 10th rank Note You know when they said that if you made a small wof version of an NCV, it gets accepted? I proved that correct by making Tinyhouse, which is a smaller version of Minihouse. However, this is Tineants Checkers, which is a smaller version of Sergeants Checkers. Unlike regular sergeants checkers, you can compete for a stalemate, but good luck! I was actually suprised that Golden Gates got declined, cause I found a lot of strategies and I wrote a long description that took 30 minutes to make.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 3 | 2 Gamerules Stalemate Loses Promotion King, Knight, Rook, Alibaba on the 8th rank Note "Inspired by" Trịnh-Nguyễn chess

Is it correct that mainly, players criticize Duck Chess for the “blocker” function of the duck? What should a “duck in reverse” which is not a “blocker”, at least for pieces moving to its square, and upgrades the pieces be called? Here is a table for this “duck in reverse” changes the pieces on a or h file on b or g file on c or f file on d or e file Pawn WcfF NmfWcfF FmfW Commoner Knight NW Wildebeest NF General Bishop Dragon Horse Archbishop BA BAW Rook RD Chancellor Dragon King RDF Queen QD Amazon QA QAD King* R2F General B2W Q2 Is this a good variant? What changes should I make? Is it balanced? I don't really have much more to say, I'm just throwing this idea out into the void.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Timecontrol 2 | 8 Gamerules Anonymous, Takeover, Sideways Promotion 1pt Queen, undefined, undefined, Wildebeest, Dragon Bishop, undefined on the 4th rank

My friend created this variant, and I've played it a few times, but he's not in this club so I'm sharing it instead. This game is similar to duck chess: it's normal chess, but each turn you can tell your opponent a move s/he cannot play. On move one, black could tell white not to play d4. This can lead to some sharp gameplay, as a game could go 1. e4 Nc6 2. Qh5 e5 3. Qxf7, at which point white could tell black he is not allowed to play Kxf7, and the game would end. Like duck chess, I think that this variant should not just be made as a variant but also a game rule. Obviously it wouldn't work with, say, fog of war, but it could be adapted for 4PC as well as other variants such as Atomic and Antichess. So I am asking for input. Is this a good variant/gamerule? Could it be added? Let me know!

i know i did this again but this time i have the photo.who's laughing now eh?

This game is a version of Japanese chess called Heishitoōkunoshidan, which resembles the initial form of the crazy house variant (JAPANESE shogi). The pawns are placed in the Bishop-Manchester position, and the game aims to capture all the rival's chess pieces and conquer their king.Let's talk about Japanese chess, also known as Heishitoōkunoshidan. The game has some exciting rules, including "crazy house," where pieces you captured are placed, "regicide," where you need to capture the king to win, "diplomacy," where arrows and circles are used publicly; and "custom promotion," where pieces can be promoted to ACGKNQ.

What did the knight and bishop do? knight camel Amazon general chancellor archbishop wildebeest knight-rider camel-rider none none king general Amazon none none none none none none none none Queen general Amazon none none none none none none none none rook chancellor none none none none none none none none none bishop archbishop alfil Alibaba ferz sergeant soldier alfil-rider Alibaba-rider berolina dragon bishop

The duck of Duck Chess has the major problem that apart from it being an unrestricted veto over the opponent‘s next move from that position, nobody likes having extraordinary illegal moves. Since both players just playing this piece where the opponent can’t move anyway defeats the point of its existence, I suggest a variant where it works in reverse, not blocking the square where it stands and permitting for the opponent‘s next move, moves which the pieces cannot normally make according to the file where it stands: a and h files: Pawn -> WfcF Knight -> NW Bishop -> Dragon Horse Rook -> RD Queen -> QD King -> R2F, royal b and g files: Pawn -> NmfWcfF Knight -> Wildebeest Bishop -> Archbishop Rook -> Chancellor Queen -> Amazon King -> Royal General c and f files: Pawn -> FmfW Knight -> NF Bishop -> BA Rook -> Dragon King Queen -> QA King -> B2W, royal d file: Pawn -> Commoner Knight -> General Bishop -> BAW Rook -> RDF Queen -> QAD King -> Q2, royal e file same as d file but anything is royal Is this a good variant? What changes should I make? Is it balanced? I don't really have much more to say, I'm just throwing this idea out into the void.

The duck of Duck Chess has the major problem that apart from it being an unrestricted veto over the opponent‘s next move from that position, nobody likes having extraordinary illegal moves. Since both players just playing this piece where the opponent can’t move anyway defeats the point of its existence, I suggest a variant where it works in reverse, not blocking the square where it stands and permitting for the opponent‘s next move, moves which the pieces cannot normally make according to the file where it stands: a and h files: Pawn -> WfcF Knight -> NW Bishop -> Dragon Horse Rook -> RD Queen -> QD King -> R2F, royal b and g files: Pawn -> NmfWcfF Knight -> Wildebeest Bishop -> Archbishop Rook -> Chancellor Queen -> Amazon King -> Royal General c and f files: Pawn -> FmfW Knight -> NF Bishop -> BA Rook -> Dragon King Queen -> QA King -> B2W, royal d file: Pawn -> Commoner Knight -> General Bishop -> BAW Rook -> RDF Queen -> QAD King -> Q2, royal e file same as d file but anything is royal Is this a good variant? What changes should I make? Is it balanced? I don't really have much more to say, I'm just throwing this idea out into the void.

The duck of Duck Chess has the major problem that apart from it being an unrestricted veto over the opponent‘s next move from that position, nobody likes having extraordinary illegal moves. Since both players just playing this piece where the opponent can’t move anyway defeats the point of its existence, I suggest a variant where it works in reverse, not blocking the square where it stands and permitting for the opponent‘s next move, moves which the pieces cannot normally make according to the file where it stands: a and h files: Pawn -> WfcF Knight -> NW Bishop -> Dragon Horse Rook -> RD Queen -> QD King -> R2F, royal b and g files: Pawn -> NmfWcfF Knight -> Wildebeest Bishop -> Archbishop Rook -> Chancellor Queen -> Amazon King -> Royal General c and f files: Pawn -> FmfW Knight -> NF Bishop -> BA Rook -> Dragon King Queen -> QA King -> B2W, royal d file: Pawn -> Commoner Knight -> General Bishop -> BAW Rook -> RDF Queen -> QAD King -> Q2, royal e file same as d file but anything is royal Is this a good variant? What changes should I make? Is it balanced? I don't really have much more to say, I'm just throwing this idea out into the void.