Voting about rules for the next season

Team Bucharest is voting below:

Question 1,Competition Format:  Vote Option 3

Question 2,Closed accs recount: Vote Option 1

Question 3. Team eligibility: Vote Option 2, Suboption a) and b)

to suboption c) i agree with Adriano. We could propose a porcentage of players that should have the city name on their profile. I propose 60% minimum.

Question 4 Flag rule: vote  option 1 and also option 2.

We can maintain the flag rule(option1) and aplly also option 2. If the teams use this rule to cheat tournament director or the board council cand remove a team if that team doesn.t follow the fairplay standards.

If we remove option 1 then i think it will be a chaos because some teams can register more foreign flag players and then base on what number the tournament director will remove a team from the tournament?

i think a mix between option 1 and 2 is the best.

Question 5 Direction. unfortunately i don't have the time to help. Sorry :(

Joe, I tell you for the 4th and the last time.

The discussion takes place in another topic.

http://www.chess.com/groups/forumview/competition-format-for-the-next-year

I carefully reproduce all your posts (that were not vandalized by you). Please, switch to chatting there.

This topic is for voting.

I've had to open it after you have made voting in the previous one impossible, but you insist on spamming in both topics and vandalizing them (only because all your unjustified complaints were proved wrong).

hervasij_vylivaha

Question 1.Option 1

Question 2.Option 3

Question 3.Option 1

Question 4 Option 1

we are willing to continue to participate

Team kuda hitam votes , 

Question 1 . Option 1 

Question 2 . Option 1

Question 3 . Option 1

Question 4 . Option 1 

I now close the voting. Everyone has had more than enough time to express his opinion.

Most team admins consider that current (last season's) rules are good enough.

Hello Marignon,

What is your vote regardind banning the fictionary teams?

Adriano(Ukraine), me(Bucharest) and Dale( Prague) voted for banning fictionary teams.

And there are 4 votes for maintaing the actual rule. Babylon, Kuda Hitam, Ekaterinburg and Minsk. But Minsk is not in the first 12 teams. So remains 3 votes.

So we have 3 votes for banning fictionary teams and 3 votes against.

What about you Marignon?

What is your opinion regarding this option?

Looks like your vote is the decisive one.

Kind regards,

Better question is what are the "fictionary" teams?

However, if you want to ban region teams from participating (Quebec, Toulouse, Babylon, ...) it wouldn't be so easy, and some new rule about % of players with city name on profile page should be introduced.

Because, without that new rule, changing team name and/or wording of their public profile, can assure that those teams can continue participating.

I'm not sure that this rule will be good solution, not just because it will be to hard to define it properly and to follow it by TD, but it will restrict this league only to the biggest cities, and take away right to play to many players who are not from those biggest cities.

However, if you think that some regional teams are not playing fairly, taking too much advantage from their status of not being too big city, maybe there is some other way to deal with those cases, without immediately ban

Hello Phoenix,

I agree with you.

Me and Adriano also spoked earlier on this voting on introducind a new rule with the  percentage of players with city name on profile that shoulkd participate on the matches

i suggested 60%. Besides you, me and Adriano nobody spoke about this.

Marignon we are 3 people that suggests to introduce a minimum percentage of players that should have the city name on their profile.

What do you say about this?

If you will agree with this, i will help analizing all players from all matches when you will ask me the results of the game.  I will do this work. You don't have to do more work on this case.

If there are extra players(that have not their city to their profile) that passes more than the established percentage (?%), we will penalize the team with the number of games of the extra players. Let's say that a team signed 80% players that don't have their city name on their profile(which is the case of many teams including number one babylon). And let's say that we will vote for allowing only 40% players that don't have the city name on their profile.

Than 80% -40%=40% In this case we could penalize the 40% unallowed percentage. That 40% if it's represented  by 5 players then we could p enalize the team with 10 points(5 players plays 2 games each).

What do you say about my proposal?

I repeat. This will not suppose extra work for you. I will handle this analize.

Sorry, I'm against your proposal. 

The analysis that you offer to handle is also unnecessary. 

It's not just my opinion Marignon. Phoenix Scorpion and Adriano also spoke about introducing a minimum percetage of players with their city name on their profile. I am not the only one.

Before you were different and open to the ideeas of the admins.

You can't say that you are against of a proposal coming from 3 admins of 3 teams participating in this competition.

With this attitude you are getting very close of the Anastasakis attitude.

Sorry for saying you that. Take it as a constructive critique.

And about banning fictionary and regional teams what is your opinion  Marignon?

The votes are 3-3.

Just to be clear. I've never said that I am for introducing a minimum percentage, I just said that it should be done if you want to ban ALL regional teams. And I also said that instead of doing that, you can object directly against some regional teams if you think that they are playing unfairly

Sorry Phoenix if i misunderstood you.

I objected in the past against the regional teams that used player from the entire region instead of using players only from their city.

4 teams from the first 10 are doing that and i proved it.

By objecting nothing was done. That's why i proposed banning regional teams and allowing only city team to participate.

Phoenix there are a lot of group competitions for the regional teams.

Our competition is called World Cities Tournament and not World Regional Tournament.

But again nobody listens to me. :(

This competition should be very fun if the tournament director would allow only city team to participate.

Nobody likes this comments that are never ending and that are consuming us a lot of time. We loose this valuable time and nobody will give it back to us.

I thought that here on this new tournament the tournament director was pleading for a fair tournament.