> What do you mean by rephrasing that question?
[What is your way to protect them?] ==> [How exactly do you protect these players?]
Playing "CHESS" as an under-400 ELO
Sort:
SixInchSamurai wrote:
Lets try to rephrase da question: how exactly do you protect these players?
Aknowledging and calling out the lies deters and disuades the liars and make the u-400 more cautious and self conscious
SixInchSamurai wrote:
Perhaps low-rated players annoy you in some other way?
It is a self projection. He doesn't approve being a U-400 himself so its annoying for him witnessing this behaviour in others
SixInchSamurai wrote:
> He doesn't approve... so its annoying for him...
Who?
I was talking about @MaestroDelAjedrez2025 , but I think it wouldn't be wrong to say its aplicable to almost everybody
I am a 150 one. But in game reviews my rating is kind of above 400
SixInchSamurai wrote:
Ok, lets wait for his answer about da self projection
Beware that the majority of people won't admit it because its more confortable for them to believe they are smarter than that. Especially chess players imo
May 27, 2025
0
#37
sb989 wrote:
weren't you under 400 at some point? & anyone under 400 still plays chess with the same rules. the only difference is the higher rating the less blunders. it is chess and it will be chess no matter the rating. what do u think they are playing if its not chess then? checkers? to say that anyone below 400 doesn't play chess is what's actually disrespectful, especially cuz the average rating here is 666
I thought its 585?
DrSpudnik wrote:
By now it should be obvious that this guy is just a troll.
@DrSpudnik as a chess.com member for several years, I have witnessed the decay of optimism in the tone of your coments in chess.com forums. I understand that after so many years of reading nonsense its just easier to put on the TROLL etiquette on someone rather than really dissect what the real message is
Lets try to rephrase da question: how exactly do you protect these players?