Some mysterious person bought me a premium membership!

Sort:
Pawned_064
daFoxy wrote:
MagnetsCarlsens wrote:

A premium account on this site is useless anyway. 

It’s useful if you want unlimited tactics, puzzle rush, lessons, and videos. 

 

Ya

daFoxy

It’s certainly much cheaper than getting a chess coach. 

bong711
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

A premium account on this site is useless anyway. 

AD FREE alone makes the premium account worth it.

Pawned_064
bong711 wrote:
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

A premium account on this site is useless anyway. 

AD FREE alone makes the premium account worth it.

Not much if you have an ad-blocker. 

daFoxy

Using ad blocker doesn’t benefit chess.com. They won’t earn any money from ads if you use an ad blocker. 

daFoxy
bong711 wrote:
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

A premium account on this site is useless anyway. 

AD FREE alone makes the premium account worth it.

Really? Then there should a “bronze” membership (that costs less than gold), but the only benefit is no ads. 

daFoxy
Itude wrote:
daFoxy wrote:

Using ad blocker doesn’t benefit chess.com. They won’t earn any money from ads if you use an ad blocker. 

What about if I use a beta blocker ?

Not sure what that is. Sry. 

daFoxy

Well that’s something I didn’t know. Glad to know. Why is it called Beta blocker? 

drmrboss
daFoxy wrote:

Well that’s something I didn’t know. Glad to know. Why is it called Beta blocker? 

Because they works/bind on Beta receptors (chemical receptors) of the heart. 

Pawned_064
daFoxy wrote:

Using ad blocker doesn’t benefit chess.com. They won’t earn any money from ads if you use an ad blocker. 

tongue.png

wollyhood
daFoxy wrote:
bong711 wrote:
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

A premium account on this site is useless anyway. 

AD FREE alone makes the premium account worth it.

Really? Then there should a “bronze” membership (that costs less than gold), but the only benefit is no ads. 

hehehe at all you windows users.

I have the most basic form of linux, and no ads at all. Auto. Unless you mean the banner that has danny rensch's name on it? surely that's not what you mean.

Pawned_064

happy.png

Pawned_064
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

I see no reason supporting them by allowing ads or paying for something on a site that is not much for free speech and overcharges for things you can get for free elsewhere. The fact that you are not allowed to mention other sites on here tells a lot about how much value you actually get compared to their free competitors. If you got a great product, you don't need moats.

I'm not saying this site doesn't have its upsides (they do, especially the number of players on here), but those upsides is largely due to a superior domain name and an established brand. To pay so much for bloat services that you can get elsewhere with such a resource-light game as chess doesn't make much sense to me.

YUP. Also the good thing about other sites is that we can actually mention other sites over there.

52yrral

Why are you two here then?

blueemu
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

... a site that is not much for free speech...

Not sure I understand this remark.

Are you saying that you are silenced whenever you try to tell people that the Scandinavian is fully playable? That your posts get deleted when you say that you prefer Knights to Bishops?

BattleSoldier
FREEtheBASE2018 wrote:

@rishit_india

I hope you will enjoy your new Premium Membership for 1 year

 

That was so nice of you to gift Rishit a membership! So much love going around, and great to see!

BattleSoldier

Even though I have a premium membership, I haven't taken advantage of all the lessons, etc offered for the past two years probably. I didn't cancel though as I feel like the staff should get paid for all their work as I suspect they don't get paid a whole lot. The moderators should be compensated too, I think. 

Not everyone can afford a membership, obviously, but since I can, I mainly want to support salaries of the staff. I think it's a great site.

NobleElevator
xD yeah, one I usually get a membership, but one time, someone upgraded my membership. I was a little surprised, but I was happy :D. The thing was- I think the member’s account was 1 day old...
bong711

If Someone plans to give me a membership, Gold Membership is alright. I would be happy with Zero Ads. I have no need for the chess improvement tools.

sndeww
CarlsensMagnets wrote:
blueemu wrote:
CarlsensMagnets wrote:

... a site that is not much for free speech...

Not sure I understand this remark.

Are you saying that you are silenced whenever you try to tell people that the Scandinavian is fully playable? That your posts get deleted when you say that you prefer Knights to Bishops?

Passive aggression is strong in this one.

Let the censorship flow through you