No idea. I mean, they're different, but I think they should be lumped into one category.
What's the difference between Aggressive and Attacking?

If you are attacking yet solid it means you like slow burning attacks like Alphazero or Petrosian. If you are positional yet aggressive it means you are aggressive toward positional weaknesses like putting all your pieces attacking an isolated pawn or invading the 7th rank with your rooks.

if there are two good moves one is offensive the other betters your position or gives you a defensive edge an attacking would pick the offensive while a positional would pick the defensive an aggressive player will play the move that fits their style (attacking or positional) almost all the time unless doing so will cost you material or long term positional advantage or the whole game a solid player wont mind switching things up sure he might like to play that style but he wouldnot mind switching it up every while and then an intuitive player is someone who doesnot give that much thought in every move i donot mean he doesnot think i mean he would put as little thought as he can in every move these players tend to play moves quickly and their chances of getting best,great,brilliant moves are low while calculating is the opposite emotional players have different performance depending on their emotions calm players donot i hope i helped
What's the difference between Aggressive and Attacking? The same goes for Solid and Positional. I ask because I saw this: